Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement in Pediatric Health Research: A Systematic Review.

چکیده اصلی

BACKGROUND: Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) can increase the relevance and efficiency of research projects. An overview of PPIE approaches and implementation in pediatric research studies is needed to facilitate learning from others' experiences. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to systematically review practices in PPIE across all pediatric health research disciplines regarding characteristics and recruitment of PPIE participants, timepoints and methods used for PPIE, levels of involvement, benefits and barriers of PPIE. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane and PsycInfo using a comprehensive set of terms based on the concepts 'Patient and Public Involvement,' 'Health Research' and 'Pediatrics.' INCLUSION CRITERIA: We included original research articles describing PPIE implementation in pediatric health research published in English or German between 01/2003-10/2024. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data was extracted using predefined categories and synthesized by narrative summary and thematic synthesis. PPIE reporting quality was assessed using the GRIPP2 short form checklist. MAIN RESULTS: Out of 1910 references, we included 37 original research articles, representing 35 studies. PPIE participants were mostly children, adolescents or caregivers involved in all research stages, especially in study design (89%) and recruitment (51%). Key positive impacts of PPIE on research included enhanced recruitment and retention rates and personal benefits for PPIE participants. Barriers to PPIE were financial and time resources required and challenges in recruiting representative PPIE participants. The level of involvement and PPIE reporting quality varied highly between studies. DISCUSSION: Common benefits and barriers of PPIE exist across pediatric research disciplines. Reporting quality varied highly between studies. CONCLUSIONS: PPIE is valuable in pediatric health research. Adherence to guidelines for conducting and reporting PPIE is important to enhance mutual learning. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: PPIE input contributed to the understandability of the lay summary. The findings of this review, together with parent and public input, will inform guidelines for future PPIE activities at the authors' institutions.

ترجمه فارسی چکیده

پیشینه: مشارکت و درگیری بیمار و عموم (PPIE) می‌تواند اهمیت و کارایی پروژه‌های تحقیقاتی را افزایش دهد. هدف: مرور سیستماتیک شیوه‌های PPIE در تمام رشته‌های تحقیقات سلامت کودکان با تمرکز بر ویژگی‌ها و جذب شرکت‌کنندگان، زمان‌بندی‌ها و روش‌ها، سطوح مشارکت، مزایا و موانع. روش: جستجو در PubMed، EMBASE، Cochrane و PsycInfo. شامل مقالات تحقیقاتی اصلی (2003-2024) که PPIE را در تحقیقات سلامت کودکان توصیف می‌کردند. نتایج: از 1910 مرجع، 37 مقاله (35 مطالعه) شامل شدند. شرکت‌کنندگان عمدتاً کودکان، نوجوانان یا مراقبان در تمام مراحل تحقیق، به‌ویژه طراحی (89%) و جذب (51%) بودند. مزایا: افزایش نرخ‌های جذب و حفظ شرکت‌کنندگان و مزایای شخصی. موانع: منابع مالی و زمانی و چالش‌های جذب نمایندگان مناسب. کیفیت گزارش‌دهی و سطح مشارکت بین مطالعات متفاوت بود.

متن کامل اصلی