PubMed دسترسی آزاد

The Effectiveness of Simulation-Based Versus Patient-Based Clinical Education in Nursing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

AIM: To compare the effectiveness of simulation-based education (alone or in combination with patient-based clinical teaching) in undergraduate nursing students, when measured using objectively assessed outcomes. DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analyses. REVIEW METHODS: Comparative studies in undergraduate nurses where outcomes of externally verified exams, proficiencies or competencies for both groups were included. Citation-checking, data-extraction and quality-assessment (using CASP checklists) were by two reviewers independently, and Revman (5.4) was used for meta-analysis, using standardised mean differences (SMD). DATA SOURCES: Ten databases (platforms) were searched from January 2000 to January 2024: MEDLINE (OVID), Embase (OVID), Maternity and Childcare (OVID), CINAHL (EBSCO), PsycINFO (EBSCO), Central (Cochrane Library), Scopus, Science Citation Index (Web of Science), ERIC (EBSCO) and Assia (ProQuest). RESULTS: Forty-two studies (5336 participants) were included: 19 randomised controlled trials, two randomised crossover trials, three cohort and 18 case-control studies. Twenty-eight studies compared simulation-based education to clinical teaching, 11 compared simulation-based education plus clinical teaching to clinical teaching only, and three compared more versus less simulation-based education in courses. Comparison 1: 21 studies (n = 2329 participants) could be meta-analysed, giving SMD = 0.96 (95% confidence intervals = 0.63-1.30). Comparison 2: 11 studies (n = 918 participants) gave SMD = 0.82 (95% confidence intervals = 0.49-1.15). All included studies reported as good or better results for simulation education. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation-based education, alone or in combination, may be as good as patient-based clinical teaching only to teach care skills to nursing students. Future simulation-based education versus patient-based clinical teaching evaluations should also measure clinical and patient-based outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: More simulation-based education of nursing students may result in fewer patients used for teaching. IMPACT: Increased simulation-based education may enhance undergraduate teaching, as more can be taught patient-based clinical skills in an educational setting without apparently reducing educational performance. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution as this is a systematic review. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero): CRD42022363205.

متن کامل اصلی

نسخه دارای مجوز در منبع علمی در دسترس است.

لینک مستقیم از metadata منبع گرفته شده و در تب جدید باز می‌شود.

باز کردن متن کامل

کلیدواژه‌ها

clinical educationclinical trainingmeta‐analysisnurse educationsimulation educationsystematic review
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

Nursing Students' Reports of Patient Safety Incidents and Reasons During Clinical Placements: A Secondary Analysis of the International Data.

Clinical placements expose nursing students to patient safety incidents and provide important opportunities for learning about safe care. This study explored how nursing students in four countries recognized and interpreted patient safety incidents encountered or witnessed during clinical practice, including perceived contributing factors. A secondary qualitative content analysis was conducted using narrative data from 1442 undergradua…

PubMed2026

Bridging the Awareness-Action Gap in Disaster Preparedness: A Qualitative Study of Immersive Virtual Reality Learning Among Nursing Students.

BACKGROUND: Disasters increasingly challenge healthcare systems, highlighting the need to strengthen preparedness among future healthcare professionals. Although disaster risk awareness is important, it does not consistently translate into preparedness behaviours, reflecting the awareness-action gap. Immersive virtual reality (VR) may enhance experiential disaster learning, but how it influences preparedness processes remains insuffici…

PubMed2026

Development of a competency assessment tool for clinical teaching in community nursing.

OBJECTIVES: To develop and examine the content validity of a competency assessment tool for clinical teaching in community nursing, essential for high-quality nursing education, while addressing the lack of clarity and consistency in existing methods. METHODS: A qualitative, iterative methodological development and validation study was conducted with 10 clinical teachers. The process included: (1) identification of competency domains a…

PubMed2026

Evaluation of the Bridge-in, Objective, Preassessment, Participatory Learning, Postassessment, and Summary-Based Instructional Model in Disaster Nursing: Quasi-Experimental Study.

BACKGROUND: The undergraduate stage is critical for developing nursing students' disaster nursing competencies; however, traditional lecture-based teaching often fails to promote active learning, and innovative instructional models remain underused in this field. The BOPPPS (Bridge-in, Objective, Preassessment, Participatory Learning, Postassessment, and Summary) model is a student-centered, closed-loop instructional framework that emp…