PubMed چکیده/رکورد

From Evidence to Bedside: A Qualitative Study of Mindlines in Critical-Care Physiotherapy Practice.

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

BACKGROUND: Translating evidence-informed recommendations into routine critical-care physiotherapy remains challenging because clinical decision-making occurs within dynamic and context-dependent environments. The mindlines model provides a conceptual perspective for understanding how clinicians integrate research evidence with experiential, social, and contextual knowledge during everyday practice. However, its application in critical-care physiotherapy remains poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To explore how physiotherapists working in critical-care units develop and apply mindlines during clinical decision-making and how evidence-informed recommendations are integrated into routine practice. METHODS: A qualitative exploratory study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 22 experienced physiotherapists from diverse critical-care settings. Participants had 5-20 years of ICU experience and were recruited through purposive sampling. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis following an inductive approach, with interpretation informed by the mindlines model. Reporting adhered to the COREQ. 32-item checklist. RESULTS: Five interconnected themes were identified: (1) experience as the primary driver of clinical reasoning, (2) interdisciplinary collaboration shaping decision-making, (3) contextual adaptation of evidence-informed recommendations, (4) time constraints influencing engagement with formal evidence and (5) organisational variation across institutional settings. Participants described integrating research evidence with accumulated clinical experience, multidisciplinary interactions, and contextual factors to support patient-specific decision-making in complex critical-care environments. CONCLUSION: Clinical decision-making in critical-care physiotherapy reflects the integration of evidence-informed recommendations with experiential, collaborative, and contextual knowledge through clinicians' mindlines. Recognising these knowledge-translation processes may inform educational, implementation, and organisational strategies that strengthen evidence-informed physiotherapy practice in critical-care settings.

متن کامل اصلی

متن در JumpToDate ذخیره نشده است.

برای بررسی دسترسی کتابخانه‌ای یا خرید، رکورد اصلی را باز کنید.

رفتن به منبع اصلی

کلیدواژه‌ها

clinical decision‐makingcritical‐carecritical‐care physiotherapyevidence‐based practicemindlines
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Therapeutic Ultrasound as Adjuncts to Exercise-Based Rehabilitation for Functional Limitation in Ankylosing Spondylitis: An Assessor-Blinded Randomized Comparative Trial.

BACKGROUND: The comparative effectiveness of adjunctive physical modalities alongside exercise for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) remains inadequately evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To compare the relative association of focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) versus therapeutic ultrasound, both added to identical exercise-based rehabilitation, with long-term functional outcomes in AS. METHODS: This assessor-blinded randomized comparative…

PubMed2026

Ultrasound-guided high-voltage vs conventional pulsed radiofrequency in elderly cervical radiculopathy: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients with cervical radiculopathy present therapeutic challenges owing to comorbidities and medication-related risks. Long-term pharmacotherapy and surgical interventions are often suboptimal, necessitating evaluation of optimized pulsed radiofrequency strategies under image guidance. OBJECTIVES: This superiority trial compared the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root high-voltage pulsed r…

PubMed2026

Capsulectomy at Explant: Rethinking Spinal Cord Stimulator Infected Generator Pocket Management in the Immunocompromised-A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSI) associated with spinal cord stimulation (SCS) implants pose risks of morbidity, mortality, and increased healthcare costs. Immunocompromised patients are especially vulnerable due to impaired immune responses, delaying diagnosis and increasing complications. Current guidelines recommend SCS explantation for deep or inadequately treated superficial SSI, though the role of capsulectomy remains u…

PubMed2026

Clinical Implications of Preoperative Thoracic Spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Percutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Procedures: A Large Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective method for pain relief in patients with Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome (PSPS) type II. International guidelines recommend preoperative imaging to assess spinal anatomy for placement of thoracic SCS leads. This study examines the clinical implications of routine preoperative imaging in patients scheduled for thoracic percutaneous SCS lead placement. METHODS: A single-center re…