PubMed دسترسی آزاد

Genomic Data Governance Challenges Between Research and Clinical Care: A Scoping Review.

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

INTRODUCTION: The translational nature of genomics highlights the importance of developing a robust genomic data governance framework. To inform the development of such a framework for Australia, we conducted a scoping review to identify genomic data governance and management differences between research and clinical care. METHODS: For this scoping review, four databases were searched and 9528 relevant articles published between January 2013 and October 2024 were identified. After screening, 43 empirical, legal and theoretical/commentary articles were included. The differences reported to affect genomic data governance and management practices across clinical and research settings were extracted and synthesised. RESULTS: Fifteen empirical articles revealed that the 'community' and the 'workforce' reported different consent priorities and differing understandings of the expected benefits of providing genomic data for research. Three legal articles reiterated the influence of regulatory regimes on genomic data practices and rights. Lastly, all twenty-five theoretical/commentary articles were authored by researchers; none by community representatives. While 3/25 articles described the genomic data practices of rare and undiagnosed disease patient populations, 22/25 examined the ethical, legal and social implications arising from genomic data. Among the latter, 14/22 proposed 'solutions' to address identified genomic data challenges associated with consent, returning research genomic data to patients and advancing precision medicine. CONCLUSION: Differences in understanding, expectations and regulatory regimes can challenge genomic data governance and management practices and perceptions. Considering the implications of these challenges, meaningful community involvement will be critical in developing a governance framework that responsibly leverages genomic data to deliver more equitable health care. LIVED EXPERIENCE OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Members of the Genetic, Undiagnosed and Rare Disease (GUARD) Collaborative - the LINEAGE Consortium's Community Advisory Group partner - Emma Bonser, Monica Ferrie, Alex Fulton, Caroline Kiefer, Kate Marchant, Tony Neilson, Maya Pinn, Tania Prior-Smith, Heather Renton, Susie Roczo-Farkas and Joel Taggart contributed community perspectives and critical reflections during discussions of early findings, informing the development of this manuscript. Kate Marchant, a LINEAGE-GUARD member, is an author of this manuscript, contributing critical revisions and approving the final manuscript.

متن کامل اصلی

نسخه دارای مجوز در منبع علمی در دسترس است.

لینک مستقیم از metadata منبع گرفته شده و در تب جدید باز می‌شود.

باز کردن متن کامل

کلیدواژه‌ها

ELSIcommunity involvementdata governancegenomic datahealth equityinformed consentmanagementtranslational sciences
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

Personality Disorder Diagnoses in Outpatient Forensic Mental Health: A Comprehensive Prevalence Study in the Netherlands.

Personality disorders (PDs) are associated with significant clinical and societal consequences and are highly comorbid with other psychiatric conditions. In forensic mental health settings, PD diagnoses are particularly relevant because they are linked to antisocial behavior, recidivism risk, and specific treatment needs. However, empirical knowledge about the prevalence of PD diagnoses in outpatient forensic mental health (OFMH) care …

PubMed2026

Business Associates' Involvement in US Health Care Data Breaches: Longitudinal Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Health care organizations increasingly rely on business associates (BAs) to provide clinical, administrative, and technology services that require access to protected health information. While the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Omnibus Rule extended legal liability to BAs, the frequency and characteristics of dat…

PubMed2026

Digital Twin-Assisted Risk Disclosure in Adults Undergoing Elective Bronchoscopy: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Risk disclosure before bronchoscopy should provide sufficient information for informed consent, but detailed text-based risk disclosure may increase procedural anxiety. Patient-specific visualization with a digital twin-based bronchoscopy simulator may help patients understand bronchoscopy and its risks in a more individualized manner. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated whether digital twin-assisted risk disclosure reduces pre…

PubMed2026

Paediatric biobanking in the era of precision medicine: ethical, regulatory, and scientific challenges from childhood to adulthood.

UNLABELLED: Biobanks are increasingly central to precision medicine, particularly in rare diseases and paediatric oncology, where small and molecularly heterogeneous populations make access to high-quality, longitudinally annotated biological material essential. This narrative review examines the scientific value of paediatric biobanking and the ethical, regulatory, and organisational challenges that distinguish it from adult biobankin…