PubMed چکیده/رکورد

Comparing the safety and quality of video versus telephone telehealth using simulated consultations on fictional medications for an Australian community sample: a randomised controlled trial protocol.

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

INTRODUCTION: Internationally, routine telehealth consultations have been extensively implemented in primary care in telephone or video-based formats. Despite this widespread implementation, few studies have compared information exchange quality in telephone and video-based consultations from consumer and clinician perspectives, nor have they examined related indicators of safety.This protocol reports on a randomised controlled trial assessing safety and quality of telehealth consultations across telephone versus video-based modalities for simulated consultations about a fictional medication. The primary safety outcome is patient-centred delayed memory recall accuracy as a proxy for medication-information safety. Secondary outcomes include immediate recall accuracy and quality outcomes captured through patient-reported consultation experience and outcome measures. Findings can be used to develop guidance for clinicians and consumers in their selection of the most suitable telehealth modality for medication discussions, ultimately improving primary healthcare delivery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this study, community participants aged 18-44 complete a simulated telehealth consultation with an actor-general practitioner (GP) through telephone or video, during which they learn about a fictional medication they are advised to take.Consultation safety will be reflected through participant memory of medication usage items including: frequency, timing, administration instructions, and side effects. Immediate memory will be assessed at the end of each consultation. After a 2-day delay, delayed memory will be assessed using structured recall questions. Consultation quality will be assessed at the end of each consultation through patient-reported outcome measures including: perceived therapeutic alliance with the GP, perceived empathy of the GP, behavioural intentions about medication usage, and risk perceptions regarding medication usage. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol (ID: H/2024/1249) received ethics approval from the Australian National University Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) on 14 November 2025. Protocol amendments will be approved by The Australian National University HREC. Study findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at academic conferences, and via the study website. TRIAL REGISTRATION AND DATA STATEMENT: The trial protocol including a full statistical analysis plan was prospectively registered to OSF (registration ID: osf.io/r6as3) prior to commencement of data collection. De-identified participant data, statistical code, and all materials used will also be uploaded to an online database.

متن کامل اصلی

متن در JumpToDate ذخیره نشده است.

برای بررسی دسترسی کتابخانه‌ای یا خرید، رکورد اصلی را باز کنید.

رفتن به منبع اصلی

کلیدواژه‌ها

CognitionGeneral PracticePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresTelemedicine
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

Nursing Students' Reports of Patient Safety Incidents and Reasons During Clinical Placements: A Secondary Analysis of the International Data.

Clinical placements expose nursing students to patient safety incidents and provide important opportunities for learning about safe care. This study explored how nursing students in four countries recognized and interpreted patient safety incidents encountered or witnessed during clinical practice, including perceived contributing factors. A secondary qualitative content analysis was conducted using narrative data from 1442 undergradua…

PubMed2026

Improving Handover From Intensive Care Units to Surgical Wards Using a Standardized Patient Handover Process: A Prospective Clinical Quality Improvement and Implementation Study.

BACKGROUND: Poor handovers from ICU to general surgical wards cause communication and teamworking challenges, loss of information, readmission to the ICU within 48 h and increased hospital stay and may result in unexpected death. AIMS: The primary aim of this research was to evaluate the effects of implementing a standardized patient handover process, supported by a structured handover checklist, on postoperative handovers from the Sur…

PubMed2026

Clinical Nurse Specialists' Contribution to Safe Jackson-Pratt Drain Removal.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: This project aimed to educate nurses on teaching patients about the safe management and removal of Jackson-Pratt (JP) drains at home. Using a multimodal learning approach allowed staff and patients to practice the procedure and build confidence to independently perform a JP drain removal. The project objective was to ensure that patients safely remove their own JP drain at home without complications. DESCRIPTION: Aft…