PubMed دسترسی آزاد

[Autoimmune encephalitis in intensive care medicine : Differentiation from infectious encephalitis].

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

Autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) is a relatively new group within the spectrum of encephalitic diseases. Awareness and the pathophysiological understanding of these conditions are increasing. They are also gaining importance in the field of intensive care medicine as severe cases are frequently accompanied by unconsciousness, epileptic seizures up to treatment-refractory status epilepticus, autonomic dysregulation and the need for mechanical ventilation. A major challenge is the early differentiation between autoimmune and infectious encephalitides as symptoms, cerebrospinal fluid findings and changes in imaging examinations can often appear similar. While infectious encephalitis requires rapid anti-infective therapy, autoimmune forms necessitate early initiation of immunotherapy. Delays in commencing treatment worsen the prognosis. This article addresses the diagnostic criteria, antibody diagnostics, complications in intensive care settings and current immunotherapies.

متن کامل اصلی

نسخه دارای مجوز در منبع علمی در دسترس است.

لینک مستقیم از metadata منبع گرفته شده و در تب جدید باز می‌شود.

باز کردن متن کامل

کلیدواژه‌ها

Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitisAntibody diagnosticsDifferential diagnosisImmunotherapyStatus epilepticus
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

Comparison of the Validity and Reliability of Five Pressure Injury Risk Scales in Intensive Care.

BACKGROUND: The lack of consensus on the best pressure injury (PI) risk assessment tools demonstrates the need for further comparative research to identify the most effective options for intensive care unit (ICU) populations. AIM: This study compared the predictive validity and reliability of five PI risk assessment tools in adult ICU patients. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study was conducted with patients aged ≥ 18 years, admitt…

PubMed2026

Cross-Sectional Survey of Critical Care Provision in Ministry of Health Hospitals in Zambia.

BACKGROUND: Critical care is an essential component of universal health care; however, its provision in low- and middle-income countries remains poorly understood. Although Zambia has expanded critical care services over the last 15 years, national evidence regarding workforce capacity, infrastructure and service provision remains limited. AIMS: To evaluate critical care workforce, service provision and patient case mix across Ministry…

PubMed2026

Electronic Patient-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life Trajectories in ICU Survivors: A Multicentre Pilot Study-Within-a-Trial Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Patient-important outcomes beyond mortality, particularly health-related quality of life (HRQoL), are frequently used in intensive care unit (ICU) trials. However, HRQoL assessment remains challenging due to methodological complexities, including poorly defined recovery trajectories, lack of consensus on measurement instruments, complexity of statistical analysis, and missing data. Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO…

PubMed2026

Evaluating Meaningful Patient and Public Involvement in Intensive Care Research-A PEIRS-22 Survey.

BACKGROUND: Patient and public involvement (PPI) is increasingly recommended in health research to enhance relevance, quality and implementation of findings. In intensive care research, involving patients, family members and healthcare professionals may help ensure that research addresses outcomes that are meaningful to those affected by critical illness. AIM: This study aimed to assess the level of meaningful PPI engagement during the…