PubMed چکیده/رکورد

Changing Brain Death Donation Dynamics in Spain: A National Overview of Neurocritical Care and Organ Donation Trends.

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

BACKGROUND: Donation after brain death (DBD) has declined in Spain despite sustained transplantation activity and marked growth in donation after circulatory death (DCD). We examined whether this transition was driven by controlled or uncontrolled DCD and contextualized it alongside national trends in neurocritical care and organ utilization. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive ecological analysis of aggregated national data from the Spanish National Transplant Organization, healthcare registries, and epidemiological sources for 2015-2024. Annual DBD, controlled DCD (cDCD), uncontrolled DCD (uDCD), donation-potential indicators, mechanical thrombectomy, decompressive craniectomy, and organ recovery and utilization were examined. RESULTS: Actual DBD decreased from 1537 (33.0 per million population [pmp]) to 1246 donors (25.6 pmp). cDCD increased from 211 (4.5 pmp) to 1294 donors (26.6 pmp), whereas uDCD decreased from 103 (2.2 pmp) to 22 donors (0.5 pmp); thus, cDCD accounted for 98.3% of DCD activity in 2024. Donation-potential indicators fell during the COVID-19 pandemic and partially recovered thereafter. Mechanical thrombectomy increased from 2160 to 8762 procedures and decompressive craniectomy from 456 to 729. In 2024, DBD donors generated more recovered and implanted organs per donor than Maastricht category III cDCD donors (3.6 vs. 3.1 and 2.8 vs. 2.3, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Spain's DCD expansion was almost entirely driven by controlled donation, while uDCD declined. These findings demonstrate a reconfiguration of deceased-donation pathways but do not establish patient-level substitution between DBD and cDCD. Linked individual-level studies are required to determine the contributions of neurocritical care, end-of-life decisions, and perfusion technologies.

متن کامل اصلی

متن در JumpToDate ذخیره نشده است.

برای بررسی دسترسی کتابخانه‌ای یا خرید، رکورد اصلی را باز کنید.

رفتن به منبع اصلی

کلیدواژه‌ها

brain deathdecompressive craniectomymechanical thrombectomyneurocritical careorgan donationspaintransplantation
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

Comparison of the Validity and Reliability of Five Pressure Injury Risk Scales in Intensive Care.

BACKGROUND: The lack of consensus on the best pressure injury (PI) risk assessment tools demonstrates the need for further comparative research to identify the most effective options for intensive care unit (ICU) populations. AIM: This study compared the predictive validity and reliability of five PI risk assessment tools in adult ICU patients. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study was conducted with patients aged ≥ 18 years, admitt…

PubMed2026

Cross-Sectional Survey of Critical Care Provision in Ministry of Health Hospitals in Zambia.

BACKGROUND: Critical care is an essential component of universal health care; however, its provision in low- and middle-income countries remains poorly understood. Although Zambia has expanded critical care services over the last 15 years, national evidence regarding workforce capacity, infrastructure and service provision remains limited. AIMS: To evaluate critical care workforce, service provision and patient case mix across Ministry…

PubMed2026

Electronic Patient-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life Trajectories in ICU Survivors: A Multicentre Pilot Study-Within-a-Trial Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Patient-important outcomes beyond mortality, particularly health-related quality of life (HRQoL), are frequently used in intensive care unit (ICU) trials. However, HRQoL assessment remains challenging due to methodological complexities, including poorly defined recovery trajectories, lack of consensus on measurement instruments, complexity of statistical analysis, and missing data. Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO…

PubMed2026

Evaluating Meaningful Patient and Public Involvement in Intensive Care Research-A PEIRS-22 Survey.

BACKGROUND: Patient and public involvement (PPI) is increasingly recommended in health research to enhance relevance, quality and implementation of findings. In intensive care research, involving patients, family members and healthcare professionals may help ensure that research addresses outcomes that are meaningful to those affected by critical illness. AIM: This study aimed to assess the level of meaningful PPI engagement during the…