PubMed چکیده/رکورد

Evaluation and impact of the ABCDEF bundle in a neurocritical patient population: a prospective observational study.

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical impact of adherence to the ABCDEF bundle in neurocritical patients admitted to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) in Ecuador. DESIGN: A retrospective, observational, single-center study conducted between 2022 and 2024. SETTING: The ICU of a tertiary-level hospital in Guayaquil, Ecuador. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: Sixty adult neurocritical patients with ICU stays longer than 48 h were included. Patients were classified into two groups according to their adherence to the ABCDEF bundle: high adherence (≥4 components) and low adherence (≤3 components). INTERVENTIONS: Implementation of the ABCDEF bundle, including pain assessment, individualized sedation, delirium screening, early mobilization, and family participation. The main outcome measures were ICU mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), ICU length of stay, and incidence of delirium. RESULTS: High adherence was associated with a shorter MV duration (median 11 [IQR 7-15.8] vs. 15 [15-18] days; p = 0.001) and shorter ICU stay (15 [10-20] vs. 20 [18-21.8] days; p = 0.016). Mortality was lower in the high-adherence group (23.3% vs. 46.7%), although this difference was not statistically significant in the bivariate analysis (p = 0.104). In the multivariate analysis, low adherence was independently associated with higher mortality (OR: 4.51; 95%CI: 1.07-19.05; p = 0.040). The incidence of delirium was higher in the high-adherence group (53.3% vs. 0%; p < 0.001), a finding that requires further investigation to clarify its clinical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to the ABCDEF bundle was associated with improved clinical outcomes in neurocritical patients, supporting its implementation in ICUs with limited resources.

متن کامل اصلی

متن در JumpToDate ذخیره نشده است.

برای بررسی دسترسی کتابخانه‌ای یا خرید، رکورد اصلی را باز کنید.

رفتن به منبع اصلی

کلیدواژه‌ها

ABCDEF bundleCuidados neurocríticosDeliriumICULatin AmericaLatinoaméricaMechanical ventilationMortalidadMortalityNeurocritical carePaquete ABCDEFUCIVentilación mecánica
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

Comparison of the Validity and Reliability of Five Pressure Injury Risk Scales in Intensive Care.

BACKGROUND: The lack of consensus on the best pressure injury (PI) risk assessment tools demonstrates the need for further comparative research to identify the most effective options for intensive care unit (ICU) populations. AIM: This study compared the predictive validity and reliability of five PI risk assessment tools in adult ICU patients. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study was conducted with patients aged ≥ 18 years, admitt…

PubMed2026

Cross-Sectional Survey of Critical Care Provision in Ministry of Health Hospitals in Zambia.

BACKGROUND: Critical care is an essential component of universal health care; however, its provision in low- and middle-income countries remains poorly understood. Although Zambia has expanded critical care services over the last 15 years, national evidence regarding workforce capacity, infrastructure and service provision remains limited. AIMS: To evaluate critical care workforce, service provision and patient case mix across Ministry…

PubMed2026

Electronic Patient-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life Trajectories in ICU Survivors: A Multicentre Pilot Study-Within-a-Trial Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Patient-important outcomes beyond mortality, particularly health-related quality of life (HRQoL), are frequently used in intensive care unit (ICU) trials. However, HRQoL assessment remains challenging due to methodological complexities, including poorly defined recovery trajectories, lack of consensus on measurement instruments, complexity of statistical analysis, and missing data. Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO…

PubMed2026

Evaluating Meaningful Patient and Public Involvement in Intensive Care Research-A PEIRS-22 Survey.

BACKGROUND: Patient and public involvement (PPI) is increasingly recommended in health research to enhance relevance, quality and implementation of findings. In intensive care research, involving patients, family members and healthcare professionals may help ensure that research addresses outcomes that are meaningful to those affected by critical illness. AIM: This study aimed to assess the level of meaningful PPI engagement during the…