PubMed دسترسی آزاد

Outcomes and Regional Care Patterns of Critically Ill Pediatric Emergency Patients: A Population-Based Registry Study.

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

BACKGROUND: Clarifying clinical features of critically ill pediatric patients is essential for optimizing the regional emergency care system. However, the relationships between hospital case volume, interhospital transfer, and outcomes, including causes of death, remain unclear. METHODS: An observational study was conducted using prospectively collected data on critically ill patients aged 15 years or younger. Patients enrolled in this study were those who met the criteria for emergency and critical care unit management in Fukuoka Prefecture, Japan, from June 2014 to May 2019. Data on etiologic categories, outcomes, interhospital transfer, and use of intensive care interventions were collected. Hospitals were classified according to patient volume (high-volume: ≥ 100 and low-volume: < 100 patients during the observation period). RESULTS: Among 3124 patients, 891 (28.5%) were infants (< 1 year). The annual incidence was 0.85 per 1000 children. Endogenous, exogenous, and "undetermined" etiologies accounted for 2481 (79.4%), 495 (15.8%), and 148 (4.7%) patients, respectively. Of 327 deaths (10.5%), 157 (48.0%) occurred in infants, and 89 (56.7%) of infant deaths were classified as "undetermined". In-hospital mortality among admitted patients was higher in low-volume hospitals (8.7% vs. 5.3%, p < 0.01), as was the proportion of "undetermined" deaths (49.5% vs. 28.8%, p < 0.01). Transferred patients had higher ICU admission rates (62.5% vs. 52.6%, p < 0.01), without higher mortality among admitted patients. CONCLUSIONS: Critically ill infants had high mortality, and many deaths remained undetermined. These findings highlight the need to strengthen regional transport systems and postmortem evaluation in pediatric emergency care.

متن کامل اصلی

نسخه دارای مجوز در منبع علمی در دسترس است.

لینک مستقیم از metadata منبع گرفته شده و در تب جدید باز می‌شود.

باز کردن متن کامل

کلیدواژه‌ها

child death reviewcritically ill childrenepidemiologyhospital case volumepediatric emergency care
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

Comparison of the Validity and Reliability of Five Pressure Injury Risk Scales in Intensive Care.

BACKGROUND: The lack of consensus on the best pressure injury (PI) risk assessment tools demonstrates the need for further comparative research to identify the most effective options for intensive care unit (ICU) populations. AIM: This study compared the predictive validity and reliability of five PI risk assessment tools in adult ICU patients. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study was conducted with patients aged ≥ 18 years, admitt…

PubMed2026

Cross-Sectional Survey of Critical Care Provision in Ministry of Health Hospitals in Zambia.

BACKGROUND: Critical care is an essential component of universal health care; however, its provision in low- and middle-income countries remains poorly understood. Although Zambia has expanded critical care services over the last 15 years, national evidence regarding workforce capacity, infrastructure and service provision remains limited. AIMS: To evaluate critical care workforce, service provision and patient case mix across Ministry…

PubMed2026

Electronic Patient-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life Trajectories in ICU Survivors: A Multicentre Pilot Study-Within-a-Trial Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Patient-important outcomes beyond mortality, particularly health-related quality of life (HRQoL), are frequently used in intensive care unit (ICU) trials. However, HRQoL assessment remains challenging due to methodological complexities, including poorly defined recovery trajectories, lack of consensus on measurement instruments, complexity of statistical analysis, and missing data. Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO…

PubMed2026

Evaluating Meaningful Patient and Public Involvement in Intensive Care Research-A PEIRS-22 Survey.

BACKGROUND: Patient and public involvement (PPI) is increasingly recommended in health research to enhance relevance, quality and implementation of findings. In intensive care research, involving patients, family members and healthcare professionals may help ensure that research addresses outcomes that are meaningful to those affected by critical illness. AIM: This study aimed to assess the level of meaningful PPI engagement during the…