PubMed چکیده/رکورد

[Comparative analysis of regional patient safety strategies in Spain: Structure, content, and alignment with the national strategy].

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

INTRODUCTION: Patient safety is a strategic priority for healthcare systems. In Spain, decentralisation of the National Health System (NHS) facilitates the adaptation of policies to regional characteristics, but poses challenges in terms of coordination, standardisation, and evaluation. OBJECTIVES: To compare regional patient safety strategies, assess their concordance with the 2015-2020 and 2025-2035 NHS strategies, and identify the changes and advances introduced in the new national strategy compared with its predecessor. METHODS: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted using documentary analysis of the strategies of Spain's 17 autonomous communities and the autonomous cities of Ceuta and Melilla. Their general characteristics and lines of action were analysed and classified according to their hierarchical level as primary, secondary, or absent. Concordance was assessed by directly comparing regional lines of action with conceptually equivalent lines in the 2015-2020 and 2025-2035 NHS strategies. An evolutionary content analysis was also conducted to identify changes between the two national strategies. Two researchers independently reviewed and coded all documentation, resolving discrepancies by consensus. RESULTS: Fourteen regional strategies were identified, showing considerable heterogeneity in structure, terminology, content, and evaluation systems. Eleven lines of action were present in all 14 strategies (100%), including organisation and leadership, safety culture and training, patient involvement, risk management, incident reporting, and safe practices related to healthcare-associated infections, surgery, medication, patient identification, and care. Coverage was lower for digital health and safe use of information and communication technologies (28.6%), safe healthcare environments and emergency care (35.7%), and transfusion safety, diagnostic safety, and low-value practices (42.9%). The 2025-2035 NHS strategy broadens the scope of safe clinical practices and incorporates emerging challenges related to digitalisation, continuity of care, and the reduction of low-value practices. CONCLUSIONS: Regional patient safety strategies show broad convergence around core lines of action, together with substantial heterogeneity in structure, terminology, and coverage of less established areas. Areas related to organisation and leadership, safety culture, training, incident management, and several safe clinical practices show greater coverage, whereas diagnostic safety, mental health, support for second and third victims, care transitions, remote care, emergency care, and reduction of low-value practices show more variable presence and hierarchical positioning across regions. The evolution from the 2015-2020 to the 2025-2035 NHS strategy reflects an expansion of strategic priorities, particularly in safe clinical practices, digitalisation, continuity of care, and reduction of low-value practices.

متن کامل اصلی

متن در JumpToDate ذخیره نشده است.

برای بررسی دسترسی کتابخانه‌ای یا خرید، رکورد اصلی را باز کنید.

رفتن به منبع اصلی

کلیدواژه‌ها

Análisis documentalDecentralizationDescentralizaciónDocumentary analysisEstrategiasNational Health SystemPatient safetySeguridad del pacienteSistema Nacional de SaludStrategies
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2027

Towards a justice-based reimagination of digital health research and innovation: actionable considerations for learning health systems.

The need to embed decolonising methodologies in health-care practice has been recognised globally. The term decolonising health, which has become a topic of increasing public and academic discourse since 2021, refers to the dismantling of colonial systems of dominance and oppression ingrained within health systems and structures. Despite the growing recognition of the need for decolonisation in broader health research and practice, the…

PubMed2026

[THE TRANSFORMATION OF LABOR ACTIVITY OF MEDICAL WORKERS IN CONDITIONS OF DIGITIZATION OF HEALTH CARE].

The implementation of digital technologies in the work of both health care professionals and the industry as a whole is a key factor in improving health care efficiency. The digitization of the Russian health care is implemented in accordance with the strategy of digital transformation. The digital transformations not only condition changes in the existing organization of functioning of medical institutions but also cardinal transforma…

PubMed2026

Moving beyond sexual and reproductive health knowledge: an evaluation of a co-designed digital engagement tool to promote sexual and reproductive health among international students in New South Wales, Australia.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the perceived impact and needed enhancement of a co-designed digital sexual and reproductive health (SRH) tool ('the Hub') developed to address SRH literacy gaps among international students (IS) in New South Wales, Australia. Despite Australia's large IS population and recognition of SRH as a fundamental human right, many report limited exposure to SRH information and face barriers to navigating health…

PubMed2026

PrEP awareness, barriers and facilitators in Malaysia in the current landscape of new HIV infections: a review.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake remains low among key populations in Malaysia despite notable improvements in PrEP awareness. This literature review aims to understand PrEP awareness, barriers and facilitators that influence PrEP utilisation. PrEP awareness ranged between 20 and 85%, whereas uptake ranged between 8 and 18.3%. Reported barriers included cost, limited accessibility, poor PrEP literacy, potential side-effects, dail…