PubMed چکیده/رکورد

Bibliometric analysis of international, English-language publication activity in anesthesiology, pain medicine, and intensive and emergency medicine over a 10-year interval.

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to clarify how English-language publication activity in anesthesiology, intensive care medicine, and pain medicine has evolved in publishing countries over a 10-year period, considering not only publication volume but also scientific impact and shifting research methodologies. METHODS: A bibliometric analysis of 20,741 publications indexed in PubMed for the time periods 2008/09 and 2018/19 was performed across 30 journals. Journals were selected based on their impact factor (IF) in 2019. Publications were analyzed for total number, cumulative impact factors (CIF) - representing the sum of individual journal impact factors multiplied by the number of publications in each journal - study type, country of origin, and country output per million inhabitants. RESULTS: From 2008/09 to 2018/19, total publication volume declined by 6.9% from 10,740 to 10,001, while CIF increased by 25.4% from 42,441.2 to 53,219.1. Clinical (Observational) studies were most frequent; meta-analyses and registry studies rose markedly (216.1% and 125.3%, respectively), while experimental studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) declined (-51.9% and -29.7%, respectively). The United States led in both publication count (2008/09: 3,267; 2018/19: 4,250) and CIF (2008/09: 14,256.4; 2018/19: 24,421.9). When adjusted to population, smaller countries including Denmark (2008/09: 31.1; 2018/19: 80.7), Switzerland (2008/09: 23.6; 2018/19: 42.1), and the Netherlands (2008/2009: 26.3; 2018/2019: 34.9) ranked highest. Germany - the only leading country showing declining publication output at 7.0% - demonstrated a concerning trend, while China (+83.6%) and Canada (+69.4%) showed exceptional growth. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies a decline in publication volume alongside increased citation activity in high impact anesthesiology and intensive care medicine journals, largely driven by the dominance of clinical studies and a growing prevalence of meta-analyses and registry studies, suggesting a shift in research priorities. Reduced publication numbers likely result from increasing journal selectivity and redistribution of research output toward open-access and non-specialty journals. The country ranking is dominated by the USA and other English-speaking nations, which can be attributed to the English-language literature analyzed. However, smaller nations like Denmark and Switzerland lead in population-based ranking, revealing critical insights into research infrastructure and institutional support.

متن کامل اصلی

متن در JumpToDate ذخیره نشده است.

برای بررسی دسترسی کتابخانه‌ای یا خرید، رکورد اصلی را باز کنید.

رفتن به منبع اصلی
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

Distance Hands-On Training Versus Video Instruction for Flexible Laryngeal Mask Airway Management: A Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Flexible laryngeal mask airway (fLMA) management is an important but technically demanding airway skill, particularly for novice physicians. Distance hands-on training may provide a scalable alternative when access to face-to-face simulation is limited, but evidence demonstrating transfer of such training to clinical performance in patients remains scarce. This trial aims to compare distance hands-on training with standardi…

PubMed2026

Clinicians' Perspectives on Pre-Anaesthetic Assessment and Their Attitudes Towards AI-Supported Models: Protocol for an International Survey of Anaesthesia Personnel.

BACKGROUND: Pre-anaesthetic assessment is essential for safe perioperative care but is resource-intensive and applied variably in clinical practice. Increasing surgical demand and workforce constraints have prompted interest in alternative models, including digital approaches and AI-supported clinical decision support tools. However, limited knowledge exists on clinicians' perspectives, values, and perceived information requirements in…

PubMed2026

Crisis Resource Management and Non-Technical Skills Training in Anesthesia: A Narrative Review.

Adverse medical events remain a serious concern worldwide; deficiencies in human factors contribute to a large proportion of medical incidents and preventable patient harm. In anesthesiology, where high-risk and complex clinical events are routine, non-technical skills (NTS)-including communication, teamwork, situational awareness, and decision-making-play a critical role in preventing errors during high-acuity emergencies. Furthermore…

PubMed2026

Artificial intelligence-assisted perioperative risk prediction, decision support, and supervised automation in anesthesia: A narrative review.

Artificial intelligence is increasingly being investigated as a tool for supporting personalized perioperative care. This narrative review, guided by the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles principles, examines clinically relevant applications of artificial intelligence and related automation in anesthesiology, with emphasis on three linked functions: risk prediction, clinical decision support, and supervised automati…