PubMed دسترسی آزاد

State Variation in Smart Device Eligibility for Aging-in-Place Services: Recent Trends in Medicaid Section 1915(c) Waiver Coverage for Older Adults.

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

PURPOSE: With caregiver workforce shortages on the rise, devices with embedded sensors ("smart devices") hold promise for supporting older adults in community and at-home settings. The purpose of this study was to describe recent trends in coverage related to smart devices in Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) waivers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This analysis examined at-home services as outlined in recent Medicaid 1915(c) waivers (January 31, 2020 - May 1, 2026) offered to older adults (age 60 and older) among the 50 states and District of Columbia. Data were obtained from Medicaid waiver applications specific to older adults or including older adult populations with physical disabilities/frailty, using state and CMS repositories. Data elements extracted included waiver text and metadata, assistive technology (AT) categories, and references to smart devices. Descriptive statistics were applied. RESULTS: Thirty-nine states and D.C. (78.4%) implemented 66 waivers targeting older adults. Three states (MN, OK, and PA) offered the most smart device coverage across AT categories, with smart devices permitted most frequently in the Personal Emergency/Emergency System category (62.1%). While most waivers permit smart devices using broad device eligibility terminology, explicit references for smart devices were identified in 39.4% of waivers across 19 states concentrated in the US Rust Belt, New England, and Atlantic South, including but not limited to motion sensors, smart pens, and GPS trackers. CONCLUSION: This study outlines emerging state-by-state variability in Medicaid coverage for smart devices under HCBS waivers. Future research should assess the relationship between state waiver terminology and smart devices that receive coverage across states.

متن کامل اصلی

نسخه دارای مجوز در منبع علمی در دسترس است.

لینک مستقیم از metadata منبع گرفته شده و در تب جدید باز می‌شود.

باز کردن متن کامل

کلیدواژه‌ها

home and community-based waiversmedicaidsmart deviceswearables
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

A preliminary model for estimating mass-specific oxygen uptake during manual wheelchair propulsion from mechanical power and heart rate.

Manual wheelchair users may have reduced physical activity and total energy expenditure, while wearable devices may not adequately capture external mechanical demand during wheelchair propulsion. This pilot study examined whether wheel-level mechanical power combined with heart rate could estimate mass-specific oxygen uptake (V̇O2/kg) during manual wheelchair propulsion. Ten long-term manual wheelchair users aged 29-38 years completed 3…

PubMed2026

Optimising Wheelchair Sprint Power Output Through Standardised and Individualised Force-Velocity Profiling.

This study aimed to develop a standardised individualised wheelchair sprinting protocol with increasing resistances to generate linear force-velocity and parabolic power-velocity profiles, applicable across wheelchair sports with various classification levels. Twenty-seven wheelchair athletes (16 wheelchair rugby [WR] and 11 wheelchair basketball [WB]) completed six 10 s sprints on a wheelchair ergometer with 2 min rest in between. Spr…

PubMed2026

User Satisfaction With Assistive, Rehabilitation, and Training Technologies: Questionnaire Development and Content Validation Study.

BACKGROUND: According to human-centered design principles, user experience and user satisfaction are key aspects when developing or providing patients and clients with assistive, rehabilitation, or training technologies. Existing tools for assessing user experience and satisfaction are often either too narrow (developed for specific technologies) or too broad, failing to capture all relevant aspects of the technology being evaluated. O…

PubMed2026

Inter-segmental trunk kinematics differ between wheelchair athletes with high and low trunk function: An exploratory analysis using two inertial measurement units.

PURPOSE: This study examined whether upper and mid trunk kinematics, measured by inertial measurement units at seventh cervical (C7) and eighth thoracic (T8) vertebral levels, distinguishes between clinically defined levels of trunk function to support classifiers' decisions in Paralympic sports. METHODS: Sixty-three wheelchair athletes with neuromusculoskeletal impairment (54 wheelchair basketball players, 7 fencers, and 2 others) wer…