PubMed چکیده/رکورد

The DC/TMD Conundrum.

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

OBJECTIVE: The goal of any disease classification system, based on the core principles of translational and evidence-based medicine, is to develop management plans that provide appropriate high-quality patient care based on accurate diagnoses, according to the core principles of translational medicine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Within these premises, the current classification schemes that are available in the field of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) practice are hardly clinically useful and patient oriented. The publication of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) is a milestone achievement that serves as a foundation of the discipline, but it clearly lacks the needed impact on the everyday practice and treatment planning. From being the potential solution to the necessity of standardizing TMD classification, the DC/TMD became an enigma in search of a solution: how to progress and move on to embed current evidence-based knowledge into a diagnostic and classification schemes that can be adopted both for academic and clinical purposes? RESULTS: This manuscript provides an overview of the reasons why the time has come to rethink, reconceptualize and reconfigure the currently accepted concepts and develop concepts based on the current body of evidence that provide improved clinical usefulness and medical semantics. CONCLUSIONS: There will be a long and difficult task ahead, but it is time to get to work and try solving the DC/TMD conundrum for the advancement of our field and enhanced care for our patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The field of orofacial pain and temporomandibular disorders is constantly evolving, and the need for patient-oriented, clinical-friendly classification systems that facilitate treatment plan is emerging.

متن کامل اصلی

متن در JumpToDate ذخیره نشده است.

برای بررسی دسترسی کتابخانه‌ای یا خرید، رکورد اصلی را باز کنید.

رفتن به منبع اصلی

کلیدواژه‌ها

ClassificationDC/TMDDiagnosisOrofacial PainTemporomandibular Disorders
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

[THE TRADITIONAL AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE IN THE PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEM OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION: ANALYSIS OF EVIDENCE BASE AND LEGAL ASPECTS OF INTEGRATION].

The article considers placement of methods of traditional and complementary medicine in the public health system of the Russian Federation, focusing on prevention and management of chronic non-communicable diseases. The analysis of the evidence base on key methods of traditional and complementary medicine (acupuncture, phytotherapy, homeopathy, manual therapy, osteopathy) was carried out, including differentiated estimate of level of e…

PubMed2026

[Chinese expert consensus on the clinical application of lung biopsy in interstitial lung disease].

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) comprises a highly heterogeneous group of pulmonary disorders, whose diagnosis often requires the integration of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic evidence. Lung biopsy is a key method for obtaining a histopathologic diagnosis, but unified standards are lacking for determining indications, selecting biopsy techniques, managing patients perioperatively, and integrating pathologic and clinical informati…

PubMed2026

Targeted US Screening in High-Risk Newborns and Infants: Indications, Techniques, and Disease Findings.

Newborns and infants with certain perinatal exposures, congenital conditions, and genetic syndromes are at increased risk for clinically significant diseases and may benefit from early detection. In these children, imaging serves as a targeted screening tool to identify actionable abnormalities during a window in which intervention may reduce morbidity and long-term sequelae. The authors summarize evidence-based US screening strategies…

PubMed2026

The Promises and Perils of Clinical Decision Support Artificial Intelligence.

Evidence-based clinical decision support artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly expanding, but its safe and effective use depends on rigorous validation, trustworthy evidence sources and careful integration into clinical workflows. Current available systems show strong potential to improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce clinician workload and possibly benefit patient care, but challenges remain before its real-world adoption. We must be …