PubMed دسترسی آزاد

[Interpretation of effect measures in clinical research: A practical guide for the clinician].

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

Modern medical practice faces an ever-growing volume of information that demands accurate statistical interpretation to guide clinical decision-making. Effect measures are essential tools for quantifying the true magnitude of an intervention and assessing its clinical impact. However, limited understanding of these measures among healthcare professionals often hinders the effective translation of evidence into everyday practice. This article's objective is to provide a clear and didactic overview of the principal effect measures used in clinical research, emphasizing their relevance to evidence-based medicine. Key concepts such as the p-value, confidence intervals, relative risk, absolute risk reduction, and number needed to treat are summarized. The p-value reflects statistical significance, but it does not convey the magnitude or clinical importance of an effect. Confidence intervals, on the other hand, offer information about the precision and direction of the estimated effect. Relative risk facilitates the comparison of probabilities between groups, while absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat provide more tangible measures for clinical application. The adequate interpretation of these concepts is a cornerstone of evidence-based medicine, it enables clinicians to critically appraise research findings, and make patient-centered decisions, thereby narrowing the gap between scientific evidence and clinical practice.

متن کامل اصلی

نسخه دارای مجوز در منبع علمی در دسترس است.

لینک مستقیم از metadata منبع گرفته شده و در تب جدید باز می‌شود.

باز کردن متن کامل

کلیدواژه‌ها

Clinical Decision-MakingClinical Research ProtocolsData Interpretation, StatisticalEvidence-Based MedicineInterpretación Estadística de DatosMedicina Basada en la EvidenciaProtocolos de Investigación ClínicaToma de Decisiones Clínicas
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

[THE TRADITIONAL AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE IN THE PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEM OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION: ANALYSIS OF EVIDENCE BASE AND LEGAL ASPECTS OF INTEGRATION].

The article considers placement of methods of traditional and complementary medicine in the public health system of the Russian Federation, focusing on prevention and management of chronic non-communicable diseases. The analysis of the evidence base on key methods of traditional and complementary medicine (acupuncture, phytotherapy, homeopathy, manual therapy, osteopathy) was carried out, including differentiated estimate of level of e…

PubMed2026

[Chinese expert consensus on the clinical application of lung biopsy in interstitial lung disease].

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) comprises a highly heterogeneous group of pulmonary disorders, whose diagnosis often requires the integration of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic evidence. Lung biopsy is a key method for obtaining a histopathologic diagnosis, but unified standards are lacking for determining indications, selecting biopsy techniques, managing patients perioperatively, and integrating pathologic and clinical informati…

PubMed2026

Targeted US Screening in High-Risk Newborns and Infants: Indications, Techniques, and Disease Findings.

Newborns and infants with certain perinatal exposures, congenital conditions, and genetic syndromes are at increased risk for clinically significant diseases and may benefit from early detection. In these children, imaging serves as a targeted screening tool to identify actionable abnormalities during a window in which intervention may reduce morbidity and long-term sequelae. The authors summarize evidence-based US screening strategies…

PubMed2026

The Promises and Perils of Clinical Decision Support Artificial Intelligence.

Evidence-based clinical decision support artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly expanding, but its safe and effective use depends on rigorous validation, trustworthy evidence sources and careful integration into clinical workflows. Current available systems show strong potential to improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce clinician workload and possibly benefit patient care, but challenges remain before its real-world adoption. We must be …