PubMed چکیده/رکورد

[Not Available].

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Face masks are routinely worn by healthcare personnel as an infection prevention measure during surgical procedures in hospitals. Their use is more variable in general practice and emergency clinics. We assessed the scientific evidence underpinning the use of face masks during invasive surgical procedures to prevent postoperative infections. EVIDENCE BASE: We performed a systematic literature search using predefined criteria in the Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. The intervention was the use or non-use of face masks during invasive surgical procedures. The outcome was clinical infection. RESULTS: The literature search yielded 675 records and identified eight relevant studies. An additional study was identified from the reference lists. Eight of the nine studies, including the two with the highest methodological quality, found no significant difference in postoperative infection rates according to whether face masks were used or not. In the two studies with the highest quality, the differences between the two groups in terms of the proportion with an infection were 1.2% and 3.5%, respectively. One study found a significantly higher infection rate when face masks were used. INTERPRETATION: There is insufficient high-quality scientific evidence to support the use of face masks during invasive surgical procedures to reduce the incidence of postoperative infections.

متن کامل اصلی

متن در JumpToDate ذخیره نشده است.

برای بررسی دسترسی کتابخانه‌ای یا خرید، رکورد اصلی را باز کنید.

رفتن به منبع اصلی
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

[THE TRADITIONAL AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE IN THE PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEM OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION: ANALYSIS OF EVIDENCE BASE AND LEGAL ASPECTS OF INTEGRATION].

The article considers placement of methods of traditional and complementary medicine in the public health system of the Russian Federation, focusing on prevention and management of chronic non-communicable diseases. The analysis of the evidence base on key methods of traditional and complementary medicine (acupuncture, phytotherapy, homeopathy, manual therapy, osteopathy) was carried out, including differentiated estimate of level of e…

PubMed2026

[Chinese expert consensus on the clinical application of lung biopsy in interstitial lung disease].

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) comprises a highly heterogeneous group of pulmonary disorders, whose diagnosis often requires the integration of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic evidence. Lung biopsy is a key method for obtaining a histopathologic diagnosis, but unified standards are lacking for determining indications, selecting biopsy techniques, managing patients perioperatively, and integrating pathologic and clinical informati…

PubMed2026

Targeted US Screening in High-Risk Newborns and Infants: Indications, Techniques, and Disease Findings.

Newborns and infants with certain perinatal exposures, congenital conditions, and genetic syndromes are at increased risk for clinically significant diseases and may benefit from early detection. In these children, imaging serves as a targeted screening tool to identify actionable abnormalities during a window in which intervention may reduce morbidity and long-term sequelae. The authors summarize evidence-based US screening strategies…

PubMed2026

The Promises and Perils of Clinical Decision Support Artificial Intelligence.

Evidence-based clinical decision support artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly expanding, but its safe and effective use depends on rigorous validation, trustworthy evidence sources and careful integration into clinical workflows. Current available systems show strong potential to improve diagnostic accuracy, reduce clinician workload and possibly benefit patient care, but challenges remain before its real-world adoption. We must be …