PubMed دسترسی آزاد

A standardised approach to systematically select risk-outcome pairs in environmental burden of disease research.

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

BACKGROUND: Environmental Burden of Disease (EBoD) quantifies health impacts attributable to environmental risk factors. The methodological choice on which risk-outcome pairs to include in EBoD studies is technically and conceptually demanding, with diffuse exposures and complex causal chains. This makes transparent criteria for inclusion of risk-outcome pairs essential. In response, we developed a standardised approach for systematically and transparently selecting risk-outcome pairs within environmental burden of disease research. METHODS AND RESULTS: The standardised approach was developed through expert elicitation and iterative discussions, ultimately resulting in five sequential steps designed to strengthen consistency and transparency: (1) define and characterise the exposure to the environmental risk factor; (2) identify potential health outcomes from the literature; (3) evaluate the strength of evidence criteria according to set criteria; (4) select risk-outcome pairs based on strength of evidence; and (5) select exposure-response functions. CONCLUSIONS: By making underlying assumptions explicit, the proposed approach to the selection of risk-outcome pairs can reduce subjectivity in the selection process and support more consistent, evidence-based decisions.

متن کامل اصلی

نسخه دارای مجوز در منبع علمی در دسترس است.

لینک مستقیم از metadata منبع گرفته شده و در تب جدید باز می‌شود.

باز کردن متن کامل

کلیدواژه‌ها

Disability-adjusted life yearsEnvironmental burden of diseaseEnvironmental healthRisk–outcome pairs
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

AAPM DWWSS report 449: Evaluation of imaging physics workforce, workload, and future needs in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: In 2020, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) conducted a comprehensive imaging physics workforce survey (2020 Survey) to evaluate staffing needs, validate prior time and effort estimates, and explore workforce satisfaction. This report summarizes key findings, highlighting gaps between training and professional demands, challenges in recruitment, and shifts in workforce demographics and employment pa…

PubMed2026

AAPM-HPS medical physics practice guideline 16.a: medical health physics scope of practice.

The field of Medical Health Physics (MHP) lies at the intersection of Health Physics (HP) and Medical Physics (MP). The MHP is one of the five subfields identified by the AAPM that in which a Qualified Medical Physicist (QMP) may operate independently to provide clinical professional services. The pathway to become a QMP employed in the field of MHP varies depending on which community an individual originates from (HP or MP). This docu…

PubMed2026

Fine wine, art, and medical physicist bibliometrics: Things that improve with age.

PURPOSE: Bibliometric indicators are widely used to evaluate faculty productivity, yet these metrics change with career stage, evolving authorship practices, and technological shifts in how science is produced. This study examines patterns of scholarly output among radiation therapy medical physics faculty at leading cancer centers and provides a framework and quantitative metrics for managing career age- and era-based effects. METHODS…

PubMed2026

MPLA case: A proposal for purchasing SRS/SBRT QA equipment.

This work of fiction is part of a case study series developed by the medical physics leadership academy (MPLA). It is designed to generate discussion of the managerial and leadership challenges medical physicists can face. Through discussion and quantitative analysis, the case aims to teach learners basic finance concepts and build their ability to gather and analyze financial information for capital budgeting decisions. In this case, …