PubMed دسترسی آزاد

Psychometric Evaluation of the Artificial Intelligence Perception Scale for Cancer Patients: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into oncology care, with oncology nurses playing a key role in patient education, communication, and trust in these technologies. Although artificial intelligence is increasingly integrated into healthcare, existing AI perception and technology acceptance scales have largely been developed for general healthcare settings and do not adequately capture the unique clinical, ethical, and workflow-related aspects of oncology practice. This study aimed to develop and psychometrically validate a scale measuring oncology patients' perceptions of artificial intelligence. The study focused on instrument development rather than testing a theoretical model of technology acceptance. METHODS: A methodological, cross-sectional scale development study. The scale was developed according to established nursing research guidelines. An initial item pool was generated using the Technology Acceptance Model, literature review and expert opinions from oncology nursing and interdisciplinary healthcare professionals. Content validity was assessed using the Davis technique and Lawshe method. Data were collected from 382 adult cancer patients receiving nursing care. Construct validity was examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's α, split-half reliability and composite reliability. Structural equation modeling with bootstrapping tested the theoretical model. RESULTS: The final scale included 33 items across three factors: knowledge, awareness, and trust; perceived benefit; and acceptance and use tendencies. Exploratory factor analysis explained 82.37% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated good model fit (CFI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.079, SRMR = 0.038). Internal consistency was excellent for the total scale (α = 0.97) and subscales (α = 0.97-0.98). Perceived benefit partially mediated the relationship between knowledge and acceptance, explaining 52% of the variance. CONCLUSIONS: The scale is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing cancer patients' perceptions and acceptance of AI in oncology nursing practice. This scale provides oncology nurses and nurse researchers with a standardized tool to support nursing-led patient education, shared decision-making and the integration of AI into patient-centred oncology nursing care.

متن کامل اصلی

نسخه دارای مجوز در منبع علمی در دسترس است.

لینک مستقیم از metadata منبع گرفته شده و در تب جدید باز می‌شود.

باز کردن متن کامل

کلیدواژه‌ها

artificial intelligencecancer patientsnursing carenursing researchoncology nursingpatient perceptionscale developmentstructural equation modeling
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

Caring Behaviours in Nursing: A Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Trends and Knowledge Structure.

BACKGROUND: Caring behaviours constitute one of the most visible ways in which "caring" is translated into everyday nursing practice, yet the field has become increasingly heterogeneous across settings, outcomes, and conceptual traditions. A field-level map is therefore needed to clarify how the literature has evolved and where it is currently concentrating. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to bibliometrically map the literature on caring b…

PubMed2026

Machine Learning in Causal Effect Estimation and Causal Evaluation of ML-Enabled Interventions in Nursing-Related Research: A Scoping Review.

Machine learning (ML) informs nursing practice, but prediction cannot establish intervention or workflow effects. Aim To map ML use within causal effect estimation and causal evaluations of ML-enabled interventions in nursing and midwifery. Eight electronic sources were searched for reports published January 2015-June 2026, followed by backward citation searching. Eligibility required a causal estimand, corresponding identification str…

PubMed2026

Effects of Aromatherapy on Stress and Anxiety Among Intensive Care Unit Nurses: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Nurses working in intensive care units (ICU) are at high risk for stress and anxiety. Aromatherapy stands out as a non-pharmacological and easily implementable complementary approach for alleviating these symptoms. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review specifically examining the effects of aromatherapy on stress and anxiety among ICU nurses. AIMS: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effects of aroma…

PubMed2026

Ethical Concerns and Implementation Barriers to Early Mobilisation in Critically Ill Adult and Older Adult Patients: Perspectives of ICU Nurses.

BACKGROUND: Early mobilisation is central to contemporary critical care, yet implementation remains inconsistent and ethically complex, particularly when patient safety, autonomy and resource constraints must be balanced. AIMS: To examine ICU nurses' perceptions of ethical concerns and implementation barriers related to early mobilisation in critically ill adults, including older adults, and their associations with professional charact…