PubMed چکیده/رکورد

Medical Device Safety Throughout the Product Lifecycle: Regulatory Frameworks, Digital Transformation, and the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Devices and Monitoring.

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

PURPOSE: Medical devices are a mainstay in modern healthcare, supporting the diagnosis, monitoring, treatment, and management of acute and chronic conditions. Rapid technological innovation, increasing software dependence, growing connectivity, and the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled systems have expanded the traditional boundaries of device safety. This narrative review examines medical device safety across the product lifecycle, from early design and preclinical development through clinical investigation, regulatory review, postmarket surveillance (PMS), software change management, cybersecurity, and AI-enabled device oversight. It examines recent regulatory approaches and implications of modern technological advances. METHODS: A structured literature search was conducted using PubMed and ScienceDirect for relevant publications from 2016 to 2026, as well as an additional literature search focused on clinical research topics for the date range of 2013 to 2026. Findings were supplemented by regulatory guidance documents, industry white papers, and key sources from the FDA, EMA, and Cochrane Library. Authors screened, reviewed, and summarized the publications collectively to use as a basis for the discussion. FINDINGS: The review highlights that although drug and device safety share common principles, including adverse event (AE) monitoring, serious AE reporting, benefit-risk assessment, and signal management, device safety requires a broader socio-technical framework. Device-related harm may arise from product malfunction, device deficiency, use error, operator dependence, procedural factors, environmental conditions, maintenance practices, or workflow failures. Therefore, robust safety oversight requires integration of risk management, biocompatibility, usability engineering, quality systems, clinical investigation standards, complaint handling, and PMS. The findings also emphasize progressive transition from retrospective and passive safety reporting toward more proactive, real-time, and lifecycle-based evidence generation. Real-world data, active surveillance, decentralized trial models, digital health technologies, and AI-assisted signal detection are reshaping how safety risks are identified and managed. At the same time, software updates, cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and AI/ML-enabled device behavior introduce new risks that may not be fully captured during premarket evaluation. These developments require continuous monitoring, disciplined change control, human factors assessment, and stronger international regulatory alignment. IMPLICATIONS: Overall, medical device safety should be approached as a dynamic lifecycle discipline rather than a static premarket requirement. Future safety frameworks will depend on harmonized global reporting systems, stronger postmarket evidence generation, integration of cybersecurity into benefit-risk assessment, adoption of Good Machine Learning Practice, and continued attention to human factors in increasingly complex clinical environments.

متن کامل اصلی

متن در JumpToDate ذخیره نشده است.

برای بررسی دسترسی کتابخانه‌ای یا خرید، رکورد اصلی را باز کنید.

رفتن به منبع اصلی

کلیدواژه‌ها

AI-enabled devicesCybersecurityMateriovigilanceMedical device safetySafety surveillance
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2027

Towards a justice-based reimagination of digital health research and innovation: actionable considerations for learning health systems.

The need to embed decolonising methodologies in health-care practice has been recognised globally. The term decolonising health, which has become a topic of increasing public and academic discourse since 2021, refers to the dismantling of colonial systems of dominance and oppression ingrained within health systems and structures. Despite the growing recognition of the need for decolonisation in broader health research and practice, the…

PubMed2026

[THE TRANSFORMATION OF LABOR ACTIVITY OF MEDICAL WORKERS IN CONDITIONS OF DIGITIZATION OF HEALTH CARE].

The implementation of digital technologies in the work of both health care professionals and the industry as a whole is a key factor in improving health care efficiency. The digitization of the Russian health care is implemented in accordance with the strategy of digital transformation. The digital transformations not only condition changes in the existing organization of functioning of medical institutions but also cardinal transforma…

PubMed2026

Moving beyond sexual and reproductive health knowledge: an evaluation of a co-designed digital engagement tool to promote sexual and reproductive health among international students in New South Wales, Australia.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the perceived impact and needed enhancement of a co-designed digital sexual and reproductive health (SRH) tool ('the Hub') developed to address SRH literacy gaps among international students (IS) in New South Wales, Australia. Despite Australia's large IS population and recognition of SRH as a fundamental human right, many report limited exposure to SRH information and face barriers to navigating health…

PubMed2026

PrEP awareness, barriers and facilitators in Malaysia in the current landscape of new HIV infections: a review.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake remains low among key populations in Malaysia despite notable improvements in PrEP awareness. This literature review aims to understand PrEP awareness, barriers and facilitators that influence PrEP utilisation. PrEP awareness ranged between 20 and 85%, whereas uptake ranged between 8 and 18.3%. Reported barriers included cost, limited accessibility, poor PrEP literacy, potential side-effects, dail…