PubMed دسترسی آزاد

Routine physics work efficacy and efficiency improvement through a shared-duty physicist-of-the-day model in a multi-hospital radiation oncology network.

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

BACKGROUND: Large multi-hospital radiation oncology networks often rely on site-exclusive physicist coverage models that can lead to imbalanced workload distribution, inconsistent task execution, communication fragmentation, and vulnerability to delayed or missed quality checks. Increasing clinical complexity and distributed staffing models necessitate operational strategies that improve efficiency, standardization, and safety across geographically separated sites. PURPOSE: To describe the implementation of a shared-duty physicist-of-the-day (POD) model supported by a real-time operational dashboard and to evaluate its impact on workload distribution, task efficiency, and safety metrics across a multi-hospital radiation oncology network. METHODS: A structural transition from a site-exclusive to a shared-duty POD model was implemented in our institution-a four-site academic radiation oncology system. A custom application, RadOncStatusBoard, was developed using structured query language (SQL)-based integration with the Mosaiq Record & Verify system to aggregate real-time patient appointments, treatment progress, quality checklist (QCL) items, and weekly chart check (WCC) eligibility. Microsoft Teams channels were used for daily communication and task coordination. Operational data from two matched 21-month intervals-before and after POD restructuring-were extracted using SQL. Evaluated metrics included task volumes, claim times, completion times, WCC performance, billing accuracy, and dosimetry-related Radiation Oncology Incident Learning System (RO-ILS) event reporting. Right-skewed distributions were summarized using medians and interquartile ranges (IQR). Surveys of physicists and dosimetrists were performed to assess end-user perceptions of workflow and safety. RESULTS: Workload balance improved across all task categories, with substantial decreases in main-to-satellite task ratios (e.g., the ratio for chart close decreased from 1.91 to 1.27). Task claim and completion times decreased markedly at both main and satellite locations (e.g., chart-close claim time decreased from 36.8 to 6.2 min at the main campus). WCC completion improved from 97.7% to 99.9%, and WCC charge capture increased from 96.1% to 99.4%. The proportion of dosimetry-related RO-ILS events decreased numerically from 31.0% to 26.7% (p = 0.339). Survey responses from physicists and dosimetrists indicated improved workflow clarity, communication, workload balance, and perceived patient safety. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a shared-duty POD model improved workload balance, enhanced operational efficiency, and strengthened routine safety processes across a multi-site radiation oncology program. Integration of a real-time operational dashboard, standardized communication pathways, and structured task-claiming workflows enabled measurable gains in responsiveness, compliance, and perceived safety culture.

متن کامل اصلی

نسخه دارای مجوز در منبع علمی در دسترس است.

لینک مستقیم از metadata منبع گرفته شده و در تب جدید باز می‌شود.

باز کردن متن کامل

کلیدواژه‌ها

multi‐site radiation oncology networkoperational efficiencypatient safetyphysicist‐of‐the‐day
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

AAPM DWWSS report 449: Evaluation of imaging physics workforce, workload, and future needs in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: In 2020, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) conducted a comprehensive imaging physics workforce survey (2020 Survey) to evaluate staffing needs, validate prior time and effort estimates, and explore workforce satisfaction. This report summarizes key findings, highlighting gaps between training and professional demands, challenges in recruitment, and shifts in workforce demographics and employment pa…

PubMed2026

AAPM-HPS medical physics practice guideline 16.a: medical health physics scope of practice.

The field of Medical Health Physics (MHP) lies at the intersection of Health Physics (HP) and Medical Physics (MP). The MHP is one of the five subfields identified by the AAPM that in which a Qualified Medical Physicist (QMP) may operate independently to provide clinical professional services. The pathway to become a QMP employed in the field of MHP varies depending on which community an individual originates from (HP or MP). This docu…

PubMed2026

Fine wine, art, and medical physicist bibliometrics: Things that improve with age.

PURPOSE: Bibliometric indicators are widely used to evaluate faculty productivity, yet these metrics change with career stage, evolving authorship practices, and technological shifts in how science is produced. This study examines patterns of scholarly output among radiation therapy medical physics faculty at leading cancer centers and provides a framework and quantitative metrics for managing career age- and era-based effects. METHODS…

PubMed2026

MPLA case: A proposal for purchasing SRS/SBRT QA equipment.

This work of fiction is part of a case study series developed by the medical physics leadership academy (MPLA). It is designed to generate discussion of the managerial and leadership challenges medical physicists can face. Through discussion and quantitative analysis, the case aims to teach learners basic finance concepts and build their ability to gather and analyze financial information for capital budgeting decisions. In this case, …