PubMed چکیده/رکورد

[Clinical practice guideline for digital smoking cessation technologies (2026 edition)].

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

Given their accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and scalability, digital health technologies (DHTs) are increasingly recognized as promising adjuncts to traditional smoking cessation approaches. To address the lagging evidence updates and lack of implementation pathways in existing guidelines, a multidisciplinary panel developed this guideline by systematically synthesizing current evidence on digital smoking cessation interventions. The development process adhered to the WHO Handbook for Guideline Development and the Chinese Principles for Developing/Revising Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines (2022 Edition). The certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations were appraised utilizing the GRADE approach and the Evidence-to-Decision (EtD) framework. Ultimately, eight evidence-based recommendations were formulated for smokers aged ≥15 years with an intention to quit. The three strong recommendations and five conditional recommendations are as follows.Strong Recommendations (3 Items)1. Smartphone applications (Apps) are recommended as adjunctive tools for smoking cessation (1C). When selecting an App, priority should be given to those that incorporate professional psychological and behavioral interventions (1A).2. It is recommended that digital smoking cessation interventions, including short message service (SMS) or instant messaging (e.g., WeChat) (1B), smartphone Apps (1C), and artificial intelligence (AI) conversational systems (1B), be used in combination with traditional smoking cessation therapies (i.e., behavioral support and/or pharmacotherapy).3. When delivering digital smoking cessation interventions, multiple DHTs, including SMS or instant messaging (e.g., WeChat), web-based interventions, smartphone Apps, and AI conversational systems, should be integrated to construct a comprehensive digital smoking cessation platform. This platform should be seamlessly embedded within traditional smoking cessation services, routine clinical practice, and telemedicine systems to establish an integrated "online-plus-offline" collaborative care model (1C).Conditional Recommendations (5 Items)1. SMS or instant messaging (e.g., WeChat) is suggested as a supportive tool for smoking cessation (2B).2. Web-based interventions are suggested to serve as portals and adjunctive modules within a comprehensive digital smoking cessation system, used in combination with other DHTs (2D).3. AI conversational systems are suggested as adjunctive tools for smoking cessation support (2B).4. It is suggested that digital smoking cessation technologies (e.g., smartphone Apps and AI conversational systems) be developed in accordance with evidence-based clinical practice guidelines and psychological and behavioral change theories. These tools should emphasize interactivity and deliver phased, personalized interventions to enhance user adherence and cessation efficacy (2C).5. While digital smoking cessation interventions demonstrate a favorable safety profile, active monitoring of potential risks, particularly concerning mental health, data security, and healthcare resource allocation, is suggested during implementation (2C).This guideline systematically establishes standardized pathways for the development, clinical integration and application of digital smoking cessation interventions across various clinical and public health settings. It provides a robust evidence base to inform regulatory oversight and optimize resource allocation within comprehensive tobacco control frameworks. Ultimately, these recommendations aim to facilitate the appropriate adoption of DHTs for smoking cessation, thereby contributing to a reduction in population-level smoking prevalence and mitigating the global burden of tobacco-related diseases.

نتیجه فارسی

این راهنما با استفاده از رویکرد GRADE و چارچوب Evidence-to-Decision (EtD)، راهکارهای استانداردی برای توسعه، ادغام و کاربرد فناوری‌های ترک سیگار دیجیتال ارائه می‌دهد. این راهنما توصیه می‌کند که اپلیکیشن‌های موبایل، پیامک و سیستم‌های گفتگوی هوش مصنوعی به طور ترکیبی با درمان‌های سنتی استفاده شوند و یک مدل مراقبت مشترک «آنلاین-آفلاین» ایجاد گردد.

  • اپلیکیشن‌های موبایل به عنوان ابزار کمکی توصیه می‌شوند.
  • فناوری‌های دیجیتال باید با درمان‌های سنتی ترکیب شوند.
  • باید یک پلتفرم جامع دیجیتال با ادغام چندین فناوری ایجاد شود.
  • توسعه ابزارها باید بر اساس شواهد و نظریه‌های تغییر رفتار باشد.
  • نظارت بر ریسک‌ها، به‌ویژه سلامت روان، در حین اجرا توصیه می‌شود.

ترجمه فارسی چکیده

با توجه به دسترسی‌پذیری، کارایی هزینه و قابلیت مقیاس‌پذیری، فناوری‌های سلامت دیجیتال (DHT) به عنوان ابزارهای کمکی امیدوارکننده برای رویکردهای سنتی ترک سیگار شناخته می‌شوند. این راهنما با استفاده از شواهد موجود، هشت توصیه مبتنی بر شواهد برای سیگارکشانی بالای ۱۵ سال با قصد ترک سیگار تدوین شده است. این توصیه‌ها شامل سه توصیه قوی و پنج توصیه مشروط هستند.

روش پژوهش

این راهنما بر اساس دستورالعمل WHO برای توسعه راهنما و اصول چین تدوین شده است. کیفیت شواهد و قدرت توصیه‌ها با استفاده از رویکرد GRADE و چارچوب Evidence-to-Decision (EtD) ارزیابی شده‌اند.

محدودیت‌ها

محدودیت‌ها در متن ارائه نشده‌اند.

استخراج ساختاریافته از متن منبع

نمای PICO و پیامدها

جمعیت
سیگارکشانی بالای ۱۵ سال با قصد ترک سیگار
مداخله/مواجهه
فناوری‌های ترک سیگار دیجیتال (اپلیکیشن، پیامک، هوش مصنوعی)
مقایسه
رویکردهای سنتی ترک سیگار (پشتیبانی رفتاری و دارویی)
حجم نمونه
تعداد نمونه گزارش نشده است.

متن کامل اصلی

متن در JumpToDate ذخیره نشده است.

برای بررسی دسترسی کتابخانه‌ای یا خرید، رکورد اصلی را باز کنید.

رفتن به منبع اصلی
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2027

Towards a justice-based reimagination of digital health research and innovation: actionable considerations for learning health systems.

The need to embed decolonising methodologies in health-care practice has been recognised globally. The term decolonising health, which has become a topic of increasing public and academic discourse since 2021, refers to the dismantling of colonial systems of dominance and oppression ingrained within health systems and structures. Despite the growing recognition of the need for decolonisation in broader health research and practice, the…

PubMed2026

[THE TRANSFORMATION OF LABOR ACTIVITY OF MEDICAL WORKERS IN CONDITIONS OF DIGITIZATION OF HEALTH CARE].

The implementation of digital technologies in the work of both health care professionals and the industry as a whole is a key factor in improving health care efficiency. The digitization of the Russian health care is implemented in accordance with the strategy of digital transformation. The digital transformations not only condition changes in the existing organization of functioning of medical institutions but also cardinal transforma…

PubMed2026

Moving beyond sexual and reproductive health knowledge: an evaluation of a co-designed digital engagement tool to promote sexual and reproductive health among international students in New South Wales, Australia.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the perceived impact and needed enhancement of a co-designed digital sexual and reproductive health (SRH) tool ('the Hub') developed to address SRH literacy gaps among international students (IS) in New South Wales, Australia. Despite Australia's large IS population and recognition of SRH as a fundamental human right, many report limited exposure to SRH information and face barriers to navigating health…

PubMed2026

PrEP awareness, barriers and facilitators in Malaysia in the current landscape of new HIV infections: a review.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake remains low among key populations in Malaysia despite notable improvements in PrEP awareness. This literature review aims to understand PrEP awareness, barriers and facilitators that influence PrEP utilisation. PrEP awareness ranged between 20 and 85%, whereas uptake ranged between 8 and 18.3%. Reported barriers included cost, limited accessibility, poor PrEP literacy, potential side-effects, dail…