PubMed دسترسی آزاد

How does smoking affect the clinical performance of a universal adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions? -An 18-month randomized clinical trial.

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

BACKGROUND: Smoking has a great impact on oral health status of the patients. As universal adhesives have become a routine dental adhesive choice, understanding the potential impact of smoking on their clinical performance is crucial. This study aimed to determine the 18-month clinical performance of a universal adhesive used with different application modes in non-carious cervical lesions(NCCLs) of smokers and non-smokers. METHODS: This double-blind, randomized, split-mouth superiority clinical trial included 47 participants(24 non-smokers and 23 smokers) presenting with at least three NCCLs. A total of 228 NCCLs were categorized in line with the smoking status of the participants and universal adhesive(G-Premio BOND) application modes (Etch&Rinse[ER], Selective-Etch[SLE] or Self-Etch[SE]). Randomization was performed at the lesion level, such that within each participant, each non-carious cervical lesion was randomly assigned to one of the three adhesive application modes. Restorations were evaluated at baseline, 6, 12 and 18-months using modified USPHS criteria and patient-reported hypersensitivity was assessed using a 0-10 visual analog scale(VAS) by two calibrated examiners blinded to group allocation. The primary outcome was retention. Secondary outcomes included marginal adaptation, marginal discoloration, color match, postoperative sensitivity and patient-reported postoperative hypersensitivity(VAS). Data were analyzed using Cochran's Q, chi-square, Mann-Whitney-U and Kaplan-Meier tests(p < 0.05). RESULTS: Among the non-smokers, one restoration from the SE and one from the ER group were lost, creating no significant difference regarding retention(p > 0.05). At 18-months, no difference was detected among the application modes within each group for all USPHS criteria(p > 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed no significant difference in 18-month retention between smokers and non-smokers (p = 0.59). Overall restoration success at 18 months was 100% in smokers and 99.1% in non-smokers (ER 97.5%, SLE 100%, SE 97.5%) Statistically significant differences between smokers and non-smokers were detected only for marginal discoloration at 6 months in the ER group and at 12 and 18 months in the SE group(p < 0.05). Both marginal discoloration and adaptation exhibited significant changes over time in both groups(p < 0.05). VAS scores for postoperative sensitivity were significantly higher in smokers than in non-smokers at all follow-ups(p < 0.05), except for the SE group(p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The 18-month clinical performance of restorations was found to be similar regardless of the universal adhesive application mode. Smoking status primarily influenced marginal discoloration and patient-reported postoperative hypersensitivity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov retrospectively registered (protocol number NCT04807465) on 03.13.2021.

متن کامل اصلی

نسخه دارای مجوز در منبع علمی در دسترس است.

لینک مستقیم از metadata منبع گرفته شده و در تب جدید باز می‌شود.

باز کردن متن کامل

کلیدواژه‌ها

Dental adhesivesNon-smokerRandomized clinical trialSmoker
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

EFCD Expert Non-Consensus on Material and Technique Use for Direct Class II Composites With Guidance on Restoring Complex Cavities.

PURPOSE: There is confusion over the indications, techniques, and material choices for placing direct class II composite restorations among general dentists. This paper synthesizes new data on the general frequency of use of materials and techniques by experts, with a previous related paper that explored if and how experts restored specific class II cavities with varying complexities. It aimed to see if consensus on technique and mater…

PubMed2026

Effect of different intra-canal restorative techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated anterior teeth: an in-vitro comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of different intra‑canal restorative techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated anterior teeth and to assess the influence of marginal ridge loss on their mechanical behavior. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety extracted sound maxillary central and lateral incisors were selected and randomly divided into five groups. Ten teeth were left intact to serve as the control group, while the re…

PubMed2026

How laser etching affects the clinical performance of a "no-wait" universal adhesive: 36-month results.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the 36-month clinical performance of a no-wait universal adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) according to etching method and application mode. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one participants with at least five NCCLs received 215 restorations, which were randomly assigned to five groups according to five surface-conditioning and adhesive application protocols: Enamel and dentin etching with phosphoric a…

PubMed2026

Fluorescence compatibility of various resin composites on cervical restorations: An in-vitro evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the fluorescence compatibility of five resin composite materials in cervical restorations using multiple assessment techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty extracted A2 shade human molars were selected, and standardized Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surfaces. The cavities were restored using five resin composite materials (n = 8). Fluorescence images were obtained using three assessment techniques…