PubMed دسترسی آزاد

More than a trend: the rationale for using bioactive materials in clinical practice.

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

The concept of bioactivity in restorative dentistry has evolved beyond the traditional expectation of inert materials designed solely to replace lost tooth structure. Contemporary restorative systems are increasingly engineered to interact with the dentin-pulp complex by modulating mineral dynamics, matrix stability, and cellular responses. However, misconceptions remain regarding what restorative "bioactivity" can realistically achieve in clinical practice. This review critically discusses the biological basis and clinical relevance of bioactive materials in restorative dentistry, emphasizing dentin-pulp preservation and the distinction between validated bioactivity and laboratory observations. Bioactivity may arise through physicochemical mechanisms, such as ion release, pH modulation, and mineral precipitation, which may contribute to mineral recovery and dentin-pulp preservation, although many proposed effects remain insufficiently validated clinically. In parallel, biological mechanisms involve modulation of odontogenic signaling, pulp cell differentiation, and extracellular matrix dynamics. Strategies targeting collagen stability, including cross-linking, protease inhibition, and intrafibrillar mineralization, may also improve hybrid-layer durability and interfacial longevity. Beyond dentin-focused interventions, pulp-directed bioactivity includes clinically established vital pulp therapy materials and emerging scaffold-based regenerative systems that remain largely investigational. However, important translational questions remain regarding the clinical functionality of current materials. Clinically relevant restorative bioactivity should not be defined by ion release or surface mineral deposition alone, but by the ability of materials to preserve dentin-pulp homeostasis and long-term restorative stability. Moving beyond the "bioactive" label requires evidence-based strategies that sustain dentin-pulp homeostasis rather than merely replacing lost structure.

متن کامل اصلی

نسخه دارای مجوز در منبع علمی در دسترس است.

لینک مستقیم از metadata منبع گرفته شده و در تب جدید باز می‌شود.

باز کردن متن کامل
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

EFCD Expert Non-Consensus on Material and Technique Use for Direct Class II Composites With Guidance on Restoring Complex Cavities.

PURPOSE: There is confusion over the indications, techniques, and material choices for placing direct class II composite restorations among general dentists. This paper synthesizes new data on the general frequency of use of materials and techniques by experts, with a previous related paper that explored if and how experts restored specific class II cavities with varying complexities. It aimed to see if consensus on technique and mater…

PubMed2026

Effect of different intra-canal restorative techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated anterior teeth: an in-vitro comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of different intra‑canal restorative techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated anterior teeth and to assess the influence of marginal ridge loss on their mechanical behavior. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety extracted sound maxillary central and lateral incisors were selected and randomly divided into five groups. Ten teeth were left intact to serve as the control group, while the re…

PubMed2026

How laser etching affects the clinical performance of a "no-wait" universal adhesive: 36-month results.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the 36-month clinical performance of a no-wait universal adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) according to etching method and application mode. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one participants with at least five NCCLs received 215 restorations, which were randomly assigned to five groups according to five surface-conditioning and adhesive application protocols: Enamel and dentin etching with phosphoric a…

PubMed2026

Fluorescence compatibility of various resin composites on cervical restorations: An in-vitro evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the fluorescence compatibility of five resin composite materials in cervical restorations using multiple assessment techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty extracted A2 shade human molars were selected, and standardized Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surfaces. The cavities were restored using five resin composite materials (n = 8). Fluorescence images were obtained using three assessment techniques…