PubMed چکیده/رکورد

Evaluating the Role of Magnification in Minimising Tooth Substance Loss During Endodontic Access Cavity Preparation: An In Vitro Volumetric Analysis Using CBCT and IOS.

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the volume of dental tissue removed during conventional versus microscope-assisted coronal access cavity preparation by an undergraduate student in extracted mandibular incisors, and to compare the volumetric assessment capabilities of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scanner (IOS) for this application. Materials and Methods: Thirty extracted mandibular incisors were randomly allocated to two equal groups: Group 1 (G1), access cavity preparation without magnification; and Group 2 (G2), access cavity preparation with the aid of an operating microscope. Volumetric analysis was performed using CBCT (RAYSCAN® Alpha Plus 130) and an intraoral scanner (3Shape TRIOS® 3) before and after access cavity preparation. Volume loss was calculated for each group. Differences in groups were assessed using the independent-samples Student's t-test for CBCT data and the Mann-Whitney U test for IOS data. Reproducibility between methods was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: The CBCT analysis revealed significantly greater tissue loss in G1 (mean 14.93 mm3, SD 4.42) than in G2 (mean 7.64 mm3, SD 2.72) (mean difference 7.29 mm3, 95% CI, 4.54-10.04; p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 1.99, 95% CI, 1.10-2.88). The IOS analysis did not detect a statistically significant between-group difference (G1: mean 5.37 mm3 vs. G2: mean 4.55 mm3; p = 0.436). The ICC for volume loss between methods was 0.011 (95% CI: -0.150 to 0.237), below the threshold conventionally used to indicate acceptable reliability; because CBCT and IOS did not sample identical anatomical extents, this should be interpreted as limited agreement specific to the present protocols rather than general evidence of poor concordance between the two imaging methods. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this exploratory, single-operator in vitro study, microscope-assisted access cavity preparation resulted in significantly less CBCT-measured volumetric tissue loss than conventional access in mandibular incisors.

متن کامل اصلی

متن در JumpToDate ذخیره نشده است.

برای بررسی دسترسی کتابخانه‌ای یا خرید، رکورد اصلی را باز کنید.

رفتن به منبع اصلی

کلیدواژه‌ها

access cavitycone beam computed tomographyendodonticsintraoral scannermandibular incisorsoperating microscope
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

EFCD Expert Non-Consensus on Material and Technique Use for Direct Class II Composites With Guidance on Restoring Complex Cavities.

PURPOSE: There is confusion over the indications, techniques, and material choices for placing direct class II composite restorations among general dentists. This paper synthesizes new data on the general frequency of use of materials and techniques by experts, with a previous related paper that explored if and how experts restored specific class II cavities with varying complexities. It aimed to see if consensus on technique and mater…

PubMed2026

Effect of different intra-canal restorative techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated anterior teeth: an in-vitro comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of different intra‑canal restorative techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated anterior teeth and to assess the influence of marginal ridge loss on their mechanical behavior. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety extracted sound maxillary central and lateral incisors were selected and randomly divided into five groups. Ten teeth were left intact to serve as the control group, while the re…

PubMed2026

How laser etching affects the clinical performance of a "no-wait" universal adhesive: 36-month results.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the 36-month clinical performance of a no-wait universal adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) according to etching method and application mode. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one participants with at least five NCCLs received 215 restorations, which were randomly assigned to five groups according to five surface-conditioning and adhesive application protocols: Enamel and dentin etching with phosphoric a…

PubMed2026

Fluorescence compatibility of various resin composites on cervical restorations: An in-vitro evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the fluorescence compatibility of five resin composite materials in cervical restorations using multiple assessment techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty extracted A2 shade human molars were selected, and standardized Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surfaces. The cavities were restored using five resin composite materials (n = 8). Fluorescence images were obtained using three assessment techniques…