PubMed دسترسی آزاد

A quasi-experimental comparison of outcome-based hybrid learning and traditional instruction in environmental health education for preventive medicine undergraduates from Guilin Medical University.

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

INTRODUCTION: In the post-pandemic era, online teaching has been widely adopted. Although traditional offline instruction remains essential for mastering medical knowledge, the integration of online and offline modalities under an outcome-based education (OBE) framework has gained an inevitable trend. However, the effectiveness of this hybrid model in environmental health education has not been fully evaluated. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a hybrid teaching model grounded in OBE for the environmental health course. METHODS: This study comprised the preventive medicine undergraduates from Guilin Medical University (the Classes of 2017-2020). A quasi-experimental design was employed, with the Class of 2017 serving as the control group (traditional face-to-face instruction) and the Classes of 2018-2020 as the experimental groups (OBE-based hybrid online-offline teaching). Educational efficacy was evaluated by comparing overall final exam scores, specifically analyzing written scores, objective item scores, and subjective item scores across groups. Surveys regarding hybrid teaching satisfaction and related indicators were conducted among the Class of 2018 majoring in preventive medicine. RESULTS: The experimental group achieved markedly higher total scores relative to the control group (Z = -6.869, p < 0.001). The Classes of 2018-2020 outperformed the Class of 2017 in total scores (all p < 0.001); within the experimental group, the Class of 2020 scored significantly better than the Classes of 2018 and 2019 (both p < 0.001). The experimental group attained superior written examination scores (78.89 ± 8.15 vs. 68.61 ± 8.27, t = -11.140, p < 0.001) and median objective test scores (p < 0.01), with the Class of 2019 presenting the highest median objective score. Subjective scores also improved significantly in the experimental group and across successive classes (p < 0.001). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the total scale was 0.911, with a coefficient of 0.961 for the satisfaction subscale. Students in the Class of 2018 reported high satisfaction (94.51%) with the OBE-based hybrid teaching model, and 40.66% of students preferred application-focused curriculum reform over theory-centered teaching. CONCLUSION: Integrating the OBE philosophy into hybrid online-offline teaching may potentially enhance teaching performance in environmental health course. Future studies could further optimize the design of online resources and the structure of offline interactions within hybrid learning.

متن کامل اصلی

نسخه دارای مجوز در منبع علمی در دسترس است.

لینک مستقیم از metadata منبع گرفته شده و در تب جدید باز می‌شود.

باز کردن متن کامل

کلیدواژه‌ها

environmental healthoutcome-based educationpreventive medicineteachingundergraduate
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

AAPM DWWSS report 449: Evaluation of imaging physics workforce, workload, and future needs in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: In 2020, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) conducted a comprehensive imaging physics workforce survey (2020 Survey) to evaluate staffing needs, validate prior time and effort estimates, and explore workforce satisfaction. This report summarizes key findings, highlighting gaps between training and professional demands, challenges in recruitment, and shifts in workforce demographics and employment pa…

PubMed2026

AAPM-HPS medical physics practice guideline 16.a: medical health physics scope of practice.

The field of Medical Health Physics (MHP) lies at the intersection of Health Physics (HP) and Medical Physics (MP). The MHP is one of the five subfields identified by the AAPM that in which a Qualified Medical Physicist (QMP) may operate independently to provide clinical professional services. The pathway to become a QMP employed in the field of MHP varies depending on which community an individual originates from (HP or MP). This docu…

PubMed2026

Fine wine, art, and medical physicist bibliometrics: Things that improve with age.

PURPOSE: Bibliometric indicators are widely used to evaluate faculty productivity, yet these metrics change with career stage, evolving authorship practices, and technological shifts in how science is produced. This study examines patterns of scholarly output among radiation therapy medical physics faculty at leading cancer centers and provides a framework and quantitative metrics for managing career age- and era-based effects. METHODS…

PubMed2026

MPLA case: A proposal for purchasing SRS/SBRT QA equipment.

This work of fiction is part of a case study series developed by the medical physics leadership academy (MPLA). It is designed to generate discussion of the managerial and leadership challenges medical physicists can face. Through discussion and quantitative analysis, the case aims to teach learners basic finance concepts and build their ability to gather and analyze financial information for capital budgeting decisions. In this case, …