PubMed چکیده/رکورد

Disclosing the diagnosis of terminal-stage cancer to patients: attitudes amongst UAE healthcare providers and universities' students: A cross-sectional study.

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

Disclosing a cancer diagnosis, particularly to individuals in family-centric cultures, is a complex process that directly impacts patient-centered care. This study explores the factors that influence attitudes toward truth disclosure of a terminal cancer diagnosis in the diverse population of the United Arab Emirates and compares these findings with practices in other nations and regions. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted using an online self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire comprised 4 sections: 9 questions collected demographic data, 6 questions assessed respondents' perceptions regarding the diagnosis of terminal-stage cancer, 7 questions evaluated their perceptions of its prognosis, and 7 questions focused on their views on truth disclosure in terminal-stage cancer. The questionnaire was developed based on existing literature and expert input. The study targeted healthcare providers, as well as all students (undergraduate or postgraduate), faculty members, and staff at universities in the United Arab Emirates. Multivariate logistic regression models were applied to determine the factors influencing participants' attitudes and perceptions. A total of 495 participants were recruited, with 73.7% being female and 26.3% being male. The majority (45.9%) were aged 18 to 24 years. The average attitude scores were 87.8% for the diagnosis of terminal-stage cancer, 85.8% for its prognosis, and 69.7% for truth disclosure to family. Logistic regression analysis showed that female participants had more positive attitudes toward diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-3.1), while participants from the Middle East and North Africa had less positive attitudes toward both diagnosis (OR = 0.653; 95% CI: 0.48-0.87) and prognosis (OR = 0.652; 95% CI: 0.47-0.86). More positive attitudes toward truth disclosure were observed among participants from South Asia (OR = 1.52; 95% CI: 1.25-1.85) and Southeast Asia/Oceania (OR = 2.1; 95% CI: 1.63-2.70), as well as among nurses (OR = 5.15; 95% CI: 2.64-10.03) and Christian participants (OR = 4; 95% CI: 1.02-15.6), whereas single participants exhibited less positive attitudes (OR = 0.560; 95% CI: 0.38-0.82). These results highlight the complex interaction between cultural and demographic factors in determining perceptions of terminal-stage cancer. They emphasize the value of customized treatments and communication techniques to address different points of view, which will ultimately improve patient support and care in situations involving terminal illness.

متن کامل اصلی

متن در JumpToDate ذخیره نشده است.

برای بررسی دسترسی کتابخانه‌ای یا خرید، رکورد اصلی را باز کنید.

رفتن به منبع اصلی

کلیدواژه‌ها

attitudeshealthcare providersprognosisterminal-stage cancertruth disclosure
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

An Evaluation of AI-Generated Clinical Notes in the OpenNotes Era: A Thematic Analysis of Clinician Discourse.

BACKGROUND: The integration of ambient artificial intelligence (AI) scribes into the OpenNotes environment presents a profound governance crisis in healthcare. While patient access to medical records was designed as a transparency reform, the introduction of machine-generated text introduces novel vulnerabilities regarding record integrity, liability, and patients' trust. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates how clinicians discursively n…

PubMed2026

Informed Consent in Orthopaedic Surgery: When a Signature Does Not Mean Understanding: A Prospective Study of 750 Patients Comparing Elective and Trauma Settings.

BACKGROUND: Informed consent is a cornerstone of modern medicine, yet the extent to which patients truly understand surgical information in the perioperative setting remains uncertain, particularly among older and vulnerable populations. Orthopaedic surgery represents a particularly challenging context, as trauma pathways are often characterized by urgency, pain, and emotional stress, whereas elective procedures allow greater opportuni…

PubMed2026

Medical Device Industry Payments to Healthcare Professionals in Japan: A Descriptive Analysis of Scale, Distribution, and Transparency Based on 2019 Disclosure Data.

BACKGROUND: Financial ties between healthcare professionals and the medical-device industry raise conflict-of-interest and transparency concerns; despite Japan's 2012 self-regulatory guidelines, device-related payments receive less scrutiny than pharmaceutical payments globally, including in Japan. OBJECTIVE: To provide the first detailed analysis of honoraria from medical device companies to Japanese physicians in 2019, offering a bas…

PubMed2026

Patient Expectations in High-Risk Abdominal Surgery for Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Despite the central role of expectations in informed consent and surgical shared decision-making, patient expectations frequently remain unelicited or underexplored and are often assumed rather than explicitly addressed. OBJECTIVE: To explore how patients form expectations about high-risk abdominal surgery for cancer and how preoperative expectations influence the experience of surgical recovery and life after surgery. DESI…