PubMed دسترسی آزاد

Patient Expectations in High-Risk Abdominal Surgery for Cancer.

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

BACKGROUND: Despite the central role of expectations in informed consent and surgical shared decision-making, patient expectations frequently remain unelicited or underexplored and are often assumed rather than explicitly addressed. OBJECTIVE: To explore how patients form expectations about high-risk abdominal surgery for cancer and how preoperative expectations influence the experience of surgical recovery and life after surgery. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews informed by cognitive task analysis and analysed using an abductive thematic framework. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Adults (n = 34) at two U.S. academic hospitals who were either scheduled to undergo, or had recently undergone, high-risk abdominal surgery for cancer; interviews were conducted preoperatively (52.9%) and postoperatively (47.1%). RESULTS: Analysis of the interviews revealed three overarching themes characterising how patients formed, understood, and experienced expectations around high-risk cancer surgery. Theme 1: Origin of Expectations- Expectation development was dynamic, context-dependent, and shaped by multiple information sources. Theme 2: The Complexity of Expectations- Patients varied widely in how much they wanted to know; expectations were often internally inconsistent and frequently conflated with hopes. Theme 3: Contrasting Anticipated and Actual Recovery After Surgery- Postoperative experiences commonly diverged from preoperative expectations, and many patients expressed uncertainty regarding recovery and prognosis, even in medically uncomplicated recoveries. DISCUSSION: The wide variation and inconsistency in patient expectations reflect both the complexity of how patients prepare for high-risk abdominal cancer surgery and their need to navigate uncertainty in ways that align with their individual preferences, values, and tolerance for information. Mismatches between anticipated and actual postoperative experiences underscore the need for structured, patient-centred communication strategies that support realistic preparation for surgical recovery. CONCLUSION: This study provides insight into how patients with cancer form expectations regarding high-risk abdominal surgery and how these expectations shape preparation for the experience of surgical recovery. Expectations were often incomplete, internally inconsistent, and difficult for patients to articulate, contributing to gaps between anticipated and actual recovery. These findings highlight the need for intentional, patient-centred approaches to elicit, clarify, and better align patient and clinician expectations in surgical oncology. Future work should evaluate intervention strategies to support this goal. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients participated in in-depth interviews that form the basis of this study. Caregiver interviews were conducted in parallel as part of a related study but were not included in the present analysis. Patients and/or caregivers were not formally involved in the design of the study or in the analysis of the qualitative data.

متن کامل اصلی

نسخه دارای مجوز در منبع علمی در دسترس است.

لینک مستقیم از metadata منبع گرفته شده و در تب جدید باز می‌شود.

باز کردن متن کامل

کلیدواژه‌ها

expectationspatient perspectivesurgery
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

An Evaluation of AI-Generated Clinical Notes in the OpenNotes Era: A Thematic Analysis of Clinician Discourse.

BACKGROUND: The integration of ambient artificial intelligence (AI) scribes into the OpenNotes environment presents a profound governance crisis in healthcare. While patient access to medical records was designed as a transparency reform, the introduction of machine-generated text introduces novel vulnerabilities regarding record integrity, liability, and patients' trust. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates how clinicians discursively n…

PubMed2026

Informed Consent in Orthopaedic Surgery: When a Signature Does Not Mean Understanding: A Prospective Study of 750 Patients Comparing Elective and Trauma Settings.

BACKGROUND: Informed consent is a cornerstone of modern medicine, yet the extent to which patients truly understand surgical information in the perioperative setting remains uncertain, particularly among older and vulnerable populations. Orthopaedic surgery represents a particularly challenging context, as trauma pathways are often characterized by urgency, pain, and emotional stress, whereas elective procedures allow greater opportuni…

PubMed2026

Medical Device Industry Payments to Healthcare Professionals in Japan: A Descriptive Analysis of Scale, Distribution, and Transparency Based on 2019 Disclosure Data.

BACKGROUND: Financial ties between healthcare professionals and the medical-device industry raise conflict-of-interest and transparency concerns; despite Japan's 2012 self-regulatory guidelines, device-related payments receive less scrutiny than pharmaceutical payments globally, including in Japan. OBJECTIVE: To provide the first detailed analysis of honoraria from medical device companies to Japanese physicians in 2019, offering a bas…

PubMed2026

Medicolegal aspects of robotic-assisted surgery: litigation trends, complication risks, and human factors interventions.

Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) sees over six million procedures performed annually. Malpractice claims involving RAS increased by more than 250% between the periods 2006-2013 and 2014-2021 [1]. Understanding the legal landscape, risk profile, and evidence-based mitigation strategies is critical for all stakeholders. This scoping review aimed to: (1) map medicolegal cases involving RAS; (2) quantify complication incidence (3) characteri…