PubMed دسترسی آزاد

Implementation of the PARTNERS model of care within two UK community mental health transformation systems: a qualitative realist evaluation.

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

INTRODUCTION: PARTNERS is a model of care that was co-designed with service users and carers to address the needs of people with severe mental illness to receive better support in primary care. Taking learning from a randomised controlled trial and process evaluation of this complex person-centred goal and coaching-based approach to care, our aim was to understand better the challenges of implementing PARTNERS in complex dynamic service delivery systems. METHODS: We identified two Integrated Care Systems that were interested in adopting the PARTNERS model of care. We trained practitioners to adopt PARTNERS to their local settings and provided meta-supervision (supervision of supervisors). We examined the implementation period that covered site engagement, training of staff and initial delivery of the new PARTNERS model of care, undertaking a qualitative realist evaluation informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Data collection involved semi-structured interviews with 10 System Change Leads, Supervisors, and trained intervention practitioners or 'Care Partners'; augmented by observations of supervision and practice within the systems and collation of documents. Analysis was qualitative informed by a realist approach and the CFIR. RESULTS: Analysis identified complex overlapping configurations of teams and roles within them, leadership, and individual characteristics influenced the systems' ability to implement the PARTNERS model of care. The presence or absence of leadership was instrumental in providing clarity regarding where the delivery of PARTNERS sat within newly emerging systems and was an important indicator of successful implementation. Collaborative leadership and supervision, alongside training tailored to the needs of individual practitioners, increased or decreased perceived self-efficacy amongst individual practitioners and their confidence in delivering the PARTNERS model of care. CONCLUSIONS: We identified that both internal and external supervision and system leadership are crucial to the implementation of PARTNERS, backed up by training delivered by a clinician and people with lived experience, to ensure that this new model of care is embedded in everyday practice. It is likely that the absence of any one of these mechanisms could make implementation and sustainability of the PARTNERS model challenging. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

متن کامل اصلی

نسخه دارای مجوز در منبع علمی در دسترس است.

لینک مستقیم از metadata منبع گرفته شده و در تب جدید باز می‌شود.

باز کردن متن کامل

کلیدواژه‌ها

Community mental health servicesConsolidated Framework for Implementation ResearchImplementationLeadershipMental health transformationQualitative realist evaluationSevere mental illnessSupervision
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

'No Dumping!' Threshold Work in Voluntary Sector Mental Healthcare in Inner-City London.

This paper examines the sociomaterial dynamics of mental healthcare by following metaphors circulating among voluntary sector providers that they were becoming 'dumping grounds' within a system in crisis. In the United Kingdom, the voluntary sector has long been called upon to deliver flexible, community-based care that reduces pressure on primary and secondary services. Under chronic conditions of austerity, however, providers have be…

PubMed2026

Are Mental Health Crisis Assessment and Treatment Teams Getting Busier and Managing Increased Complexity?

For several decades crisis assessment and treatment teams (CATTs) have been an integral part of community mental health treatment. Since their implementation, however, there has been a significant shift in demand and complexity for the general community requiring acute mental health response. This change coincides with a worldwide mental health workforce shortage and a need to utilise more novice clinicians. This study aimed to examine…

PubMed2026

Community Mental Health Workers' Experiences of Care-Coordinating Hospital Discharge of Patients With Diagnosis of Mental Health Condition Into Community Mental Health Integrated Services in the Northwest of England.

The significance of community mental health workers in coordinating hospital discharge of patients with diagnosed mental health conditions is globally recognised, yet research on their experiences is scarce. This study contributes to knowledge through a qualitative empirical intrinsic case study of community mental health workers' experiences. This study aimed to explore community mental health workers' experiences of care-coordinating…

PubMed2026

Experiential and Medical Knowledge of Shared Decision-Making: Exploring Clinician and Service User Perspectives in NHS Community Mental Health Services.

BACKGROUND: A fundamental barrier to effective recovery outcomes for psychosis, is the lack of involvement of service users (SUs) in decisions made about their care. Despite policy recommendations, implementation of shared decision-making (SDM) is inconsistent, under-reported in mental health practice and thus requires further attention. This research aimed to explore SU and clinician experiences of SDM in community mental health care.…