PubMed چکیده/رکورد

Perceptions and acceptance of healthcare providers towards the digital recording of clinical consultations: A mixed-methods systematic review.

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

OBJECTIVES: While innovations such as smartphones and dedicated applications enable patients to record their clinical consultations, concerns about legal implications and privacy continue to influence healthcare providers' willingness to adopt these practices. This systematic review examines healthcare providers' perspectives on the digital recording of clinical consultations, amid ongoing concerns about the legal, privacy, organisational, and workflow implications of such recordings. METHODS: We followed the PRISMA guidelines and included qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies. Eligible studies were identified through database searches (PubMed, EBSCO, Web of Science, Scopus), backwards reference mining, and expert consultations. Qualitative data were synthesised using the best-fit framework, and quantitative data were compiled and reported descriptively without meta-analysis due to study heterogeneity. RESULTS: Of 6633 records retrieved, 4307 were screened, and 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. The thematic synthesis revealed five key themes: (1) provider attitudes toward consultation recording, (2) impact on patient care, (3) workflow and resource concerns, (4) legal and policy considerations, and (5) implementation strategies. Acceptance levels for consultation recordings among providers ranged from 18.7% to 95.4% (n = 8). Higher acceptance was associated with confidence in the perceived benefits of recordings for communication and patient care, whereas legal, organisational, and workflow concerns often drove resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare providers are divided and hold mixed attitudes regarding the acceptance of consultation recordings. Acceptance appears to be influenced by contextual, professional, and organisational considerations, whereas scepticism is frequently associated with legal uncertainty and workflow concerns. Consideration of these factors is important when evaluating the integration of digital consultation recording into routine clinical practice. Further research is needed to explore provider perspectives in diverse healthcare settings. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: These findings may inform institutional policy development and guide organisational and policy efforts to integrate consultation recording into clinical practice, taking into account providers' concerns and organisational readiness.

متن کامل اصلی

متن در JumpToDate ذخیره نشده است.

برای بررسی دسترسی کتابخانه‌ای یا خرید، رکورد اصلی را باز کنید.

رفتن به منبع اصلی

کلیدواژه‌ها

AcceptanceCommunicationConsultationHealthcare providersRecording
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

[THE EPISTEMOLOGY OF PSYCHIATRY: DISPOSITIF OF KNOWLEDGE AND PROFESSIONAL WORK].

The article offers systematic consideration of epistemology of psychiatry as section of medicine which examination permits to analyze dispositif of science successfully implementing conceptual theoretical constructs in everyday practice. The various versions and trends in this area are considered, from traditional history of medicine with its positive or negative models of development of psychiatry to historical epistemology and histor…

PubMed2026

Association Between Participant Satisfaction and Self-Reported Clinical Practice Behaviors in a Nationwide Guideline Education Program.

BACKGROUND: Educational interventions are widely used to promote guideline-concordant psychiatric practice. However, it remains unclear whether participants' subjective satisfaction translates into actual changes in clinical behavior (CB). This study examined the association between subjective assessment (SA) scores of the EGUIDE training programs for schizophrenia and major depressive disorder (MDD) and CB. METHODS: In this multicente…

PubMed2026

An Evaluation of AI-Generated Clinical Notes in the OpenNotes Era: A Thematic Analysis of Clinician Discourse.

BACKGROUND: The integration of ambient artificial intelligence (AI) scribes into the OpenNotes environment presents a profound governance crisis in healthcare. While patient access to medical records was designed as a transparency reform, the introduction of machine-generated text introduces novel vulnerabilities regarding record integrity, liability, and patients' trust. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates how clinicians discursively n…

PubMed2026

On the prowl for disciplinary vassals: Neurologists, psychiatrists, and clinical psychologists discuss science, technology, and profession at the National Research Council's Conference on Relations of Psychiatry to Psychology (1921).

The 1910s were a complex and rapidly changing decade in mental hygiene, marked by institutional innovation, professional development, and the expanding reconceptualization of mental disease and maladjustment. This growth frequently generated friction between practical clinical sciences, particularly psychiatry and consulting clinical psychology. After years of mounting tension, the National Research Council convened a joint conference …