PubMed چکیده/رکورد

On the prowl for disciplinary vassals: Neurologists, psychiatrists, and clinical psychologists discuss science, technology, and profession at the National Research Council's Conference on Relations of Psychiatry to Psychology (1921).

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

The 1910s were a complex and rapidly changing decade in mental hygiene, marked by institutional innovation, professional development, and the expanding reconceptualization of mental disease and maladjustment. This growth frequently generated friction between practical clinical sciences, particularly psychiatry and consulting clinical psychology. After years of mounting tension, the National Research Council convened a joint conference in 1921 on the "Relations of Psychiatry to Psychology," bringing together 12 representatives to debate and draft resolutions intended to harmonize collaboration. Despite being the first coordinated effort of its kind in the United States, the meeting has been largely overlooked by historians. Yet the conference, especially its unpublished 43-page stenographic transcript and related correspondence, offers a rare window into the conflicts of the 1920s, capturing the tone, immediacy, and strategic maneuvering that more polished publications sideline or obscure. Drawing on these proceedings alongside contemporary publications and archival materials, this article reconstructs the meeting, its background, and its immediate repercussions. I argue that the conference revolved around four intertwined points of contention: (a) the definition and scope of core concepts such as "disease," "diagnosis," and "medical"; (b) psychologists' freedom to conduct clinical research without psychiatric supervision; (c) the hierarchical relationship and division of labor between the professions; and (d) the organization, administration, and authority of psychological clinics. Ultimately, the 1921 meeting saw psychologists pressing for clearer definitions, research autonomy, and practical authority, whereas psychiatrists defended broad conceptual frameworks and professional precedence that confined psychologists to experimental work and narrowly defined psychometric consultation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

متن کامل اصلی

متن در JumpToDate ذخیره نشده است.

برای بررسی دسترسی کتابخانه‌ای یا خرید، رکورد اصلی را باز کنید.

رفتن به منبع اصلی
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

[THE EPISTEMOLOGY OF PSYCHIATRY: DISPOSITIF OF KNOWLEDGE AND PROFESSIONAL WORK].

The article offers systematic consideration of epistemology of psychiatry as section of medicine which examination permits to analyze dispositif of science successfully implementing conceptual theoretical constructs in everyday practice. The various versions and trends in this area are considered, from traditional history of medicine with its positive or negative models of development of psychiatry to historical epistemology and histor…

PubMed2026

Association Between Participant Satisfaction and Self-Reported Clinical Practice Behaviors in a Nationwide Guideline Education Program.

BACKGROUND: Educational interventions are widely used to promote guideline-concordant psychiatric practice. However, it remains unclear whether participants' subjective satisfaction translates into actual changes in clinical behavior (CB). This study examined the association between subjective assessment (SA) scores of the EGUIDE training programs for schizophrenia and major depressive disorder (MDD) and CB. METHODS: In this multicente…

PubMed2026

An Evaluation of AI-Generated Clinical Notes in the OpenNotes Era: A Thematic Analysis of Clinician Discourse.

BACKGROUND: The integration of ambient artificial intelligence (AI) scribes into the OpenNotes environment presents a profound governance crisis in healthcare. While patient access to medical records was designed as a transparency reform, the introduction of machine-generated text introduces novel vulnerabilities regarding record integrity, liability, and patients' trust. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates how clinicians discursively n…

PubMed2026

Phenomenology in Psychiatry as an Ethical Obligation.

RATIONALE: Contemporary psychiatry increasingly recognises the importance of person-centred, recovery-oriented, and biopsychosocial approaches to care. Yet these frameworks do not fully resolve the methodological question of how clinicians should investigate patients' lived experience in ways that inform ethical psychiatric practice. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This paper argues that phenomenology should be understood not merely as a humanist…