PubMed چکیده/رکورد

A Comparative Analysis of US State Pediatric Dental Moderate Enteral Sedation Regulations.

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

Purpose: To compare moderate enteral sedation regulations across the 50 US states and evaluate alignment with the American Academy of Pediatrics/American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) and the American Dental Association (ADA) guidelines. Methods: An online review of all state dental sedation laws was conducted from January to June 2025. Extracted variables include permit type, renewal interval, site visit, and education requirements. State regulations were compared with the AAPD Guidelines for Monitoring and Management of Pediatric Patients Before, During, and After Sedation for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures and the ADA Guidelines for Teaching Pain Control and Sedation to Dentists and Dental Students.Results: Forty-eight states (96%) require a permit to administer moderate enteral sedation. The most common renewal interval is 2 years (58%), and two-thirds of states require 1 to 5 annual continuing education hours. Twenty states (40%) require a pediatric endorsement. Nearly all states (98%) mandate advanced life-support training for pediatric patients. More than half (64%) require an initial site visit, and 50% require regular emergency drills. Educational standards vary, though 60 didactic hours and 20 cases are most common. Most states (86%) require Basic Life Support (BLS) for monitoring personnel, and 56% require at least 2 individuals during procedures. Conclusions: Despite increased alignment with published sedation guidelines in recent decades, significant variability persists among state permit definitions and requirements. These findings highlight the need for standardized, evidence-based state dental practice acts that clearly define sedation depths, routes, and training requirements.

متن کامل اصلی

متن در JumpToDate ذخیره نشده است.

برای بررسی دسترسی کتابخانه‌ای یا خرید، رکورد اصلی را باز کنید.

رفتن به منبع اصلی
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

Burnout among pediatric dentists: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Burnout, encompassing high emotional exhaustion (EE), high depersonalisation (DP), and low personal accomplishment (PA) as measured by the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), remains poorly characterised among paediatric dentists. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate prevalence of MBI-based burnout dimensions and associated factors, following a protocol prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251238894) and rep…

PubMed2026

Knowledge and awareness of sensory processing disorder and sensory-adapted dental care among pediatric dentists: A cross-sectional survey.

AIM: The study aimed to assess the knowledge and awareness of sensory processing disorder (SPD) and sensory-adapted dental care among pediatric dentists and to identify gaps in the recognition, assessment, and management of children with SPD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey was conducted among 145 practicing pediatric dentists. A self-administered 14-item questionnaire was developed following a revie…

PubMed2026

Large language models for early childhood caries risk triage: A validation study using standardized pediatric dental vignettes.

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy and public health utility of Gemini 2.5 Flash and GPT-4 for early childhood caries (ECC) risk triage in classifying presentations as high risk (warranting immediate referral) or low risk (amenable to preventive counseling). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A standardized dataset of 50 clinical vignettes (25 high risk and 25 low risk) was evaluated against both large language models via official applica…

PubMed2026

Effectiveness of Buffered Lidocaine With Sodium Bicarbonate Versus Conventional Lidocaine as Local Anesthetic Solutions for Pain Management in Pediatric Dentistry: A Randomized, Split-Mouth, Crossover, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Managing injection pain is critical for pediatric patient cooperation. The clinical benefit of using 7.5% sodium bicarbonate-buffered lidocaine, compared to its unbuffered counterpart, has not been extensively studied in children using a controlled split-mouth design. Hence, this clinical trial aimed to compare the pain control efficacy of buffered versus conventional lidocaine in pediatric dentistry, assessing pain during …