PubMed چکیده/رکورد

Real-world adverse event profiles of Zuranolone and Brexanolone based on FAERS and VigiAccess databases: An observational study.

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

Zuranolone and Brexanolone are Food and Drug Administration-approved novel agents for postpartum depression, yet real-world post-marketing safety data for the two drugs remain insufficient. This study aimed to systematically characterize their adverse event (AE) profiles via two authoritative pharmacovigilance databases, namely the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and VigiAccess. FAERS data from Q1 2019 to Q3 2025 and VigiAccess data updated to November 2025 were extracted. Reporting odds ratio and proportional reporting ratio were adopted to screen and compare AE signals of the two drugs. A total of 631 primary suspect (PS) drug reports for Zuranolone and 102 for Brexanolone were extracted from FAERS, whereas 863 Zuranolone and 227 Brexanolone reports were obtained from VigiAccess. At the system organ class level, AEs associated with Zuranolone involved 22 SOCs in FAERS and 24 SOCs in VigiAccess, with the top three SOCs sorted by reported cases as follows: Nervous system disorders, Psychiatric disorders, and General disorders and administration site conditions (FAERS); Nervous system disorders, General disorders and administration site conditions, and Psychiatric disorders (VigiAccess). For Brexanolone, AEs retrieved from FAERS involved 16 SOCs, compared with 21 SOCs in VigiAccess; the top three SOCs by the number of reported cases were Injury, poisoning and procedural complications, General disorders and administration site conditions, and Psychiatric disorders. After signal screening in the FAERS database, a total of 78 positive signals (involving 9 SOCs) were identified for Zuranolone, whereas 10 positive signals (involving 4 SOCs) were detected for Brexanolone. Four SOCs were commonly implicated in the positive AE signals of both drugs, with the most commonly reported AEs including gait disturbance, exposure via breast milk, fatigue, and therapy cessation. Additionally, compared to Brexanolone, 5 SOCs were uniquely associated with Zuranolone, with the most commonly reported AEs such as vertigo, vision blurred, muscle twitching, somnolence, and loss of personal independence in daily activities. Zuranolone's AEs mainly involved nervous system disorders and Psychiatric disorders, while Brexanolone's primarily included Injury, poisoning and procedural complications, and Psychiatric disorders. This study would provide more safety reference data for the clinical use of two drugs.

متن کامل اصلی

متن در JumpToDate ذخیره نشده است.

برای بررسی دسترسی کتابخانه‌ای یا خرید، رکورد اصلی را باز کنید.

رفتن به منبع اصلی

کلیدواژه‌ها

FAERSVigiAccessZuranoloneadverse eventsbrexanolonepostpartum depression
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

Flibanserin safety in real-world use: a decade of US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System pharmacovigilance evidence.

BACKGROUND: Flibanserin, a centrally acting 5-HT1A agonist and 5-HT2A antagonist, is the first approved therapy for acquired, generalized hypoactive sexual desire disorder in premenopausal women. Despite its clinical availability, post-marketing data on real-world safety remain limited. METHODS: A retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis was conducted using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System from 2016 to…

PubMed2026

A Retrospective Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Driven Urgent Care Microbiology Review Program.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacist-driven microbiology review programs have been thoroughly described in the emergency department setting. However, there is limited evidence for programs in outpatient settings, especially for urgent care settings. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a pharmacist-driven urgent care microbiology review program to determine the impact of its implementation. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated urge…

PubMed2026

Key Performance Indicators for Clinical Pharmacy Practice and Administration in Inpatient/Acute Care Settings: An Opinion of the Clinical Administration Practice and Research Network of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy.

Key performance indicators (KPIs) are quantifiable measures that describe critical success factors of an organization. Their vital role in ensuring the delivery of quality health care services necessitates the development of KPIs relevant to inpatient clinical pharmacy practice. This opinion paper from the American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP) Clinical Administration Practice and Research Network (CADM PRN) describes the rationa…