PubMed دسترسی آزاد

Human perception of AI-generated post-treatment orthodontic facial images: factors associated with misclassification.

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated participants' ability to differentiate AI-enhanced orthodontic outcome images from real post-treatment images, and examined the demographic and behavioral factors associated with detection accuracy and with perceived attractiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a cross-sectional online survey (N = 252), participants viewed three sets of smile images-pre-treatment, real post-treatment, and AI-enhanced outcomes generated via ChatGPT with DALL·E 3-and rated each image's authenticity and attractiveness using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). A custom seven-item questionnaire assessed AI use and trust across daily and professional contexts. Generalized estimating equations were used to account for repeated image evaluations within participants, with logistic GEE models for misclassification outcomes and Gaussian GEE models for attractiveness ratings. RESULTS: A total of 63.2% of participants misclassified AI-enhanced images as real, whereas 18.5% misclassified real images as AI-generated. AI-enhanced images received significantly higher attractiveness ratings (mean VAS = 69.2; 95% CI: 67.5-70.9) than actual post-treatment results (mean VAS = 53.9; 95% CI: 51.9-56.0; p < 0.001). Greater trust in AI-generated content was associated with higher odds of misclassifying AI-enhanced images as real (OR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.13-1.69), and older age showed a small association in the same direction (OR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00-1.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this sample, AI-generated orthodontic images were frequently misclassified as real and were perceived as more attractive than real post-treatment photographs. As generative AI tools become more accessible, understanding how demographic and behavioral factors affect human trust and perception is critical for developing responsible AI policies and digital literacy interventions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinicians should be aware that AI-generated smile simulations may create unrealistic patient expectations. This study provides empirical evidence supporting the need for transparent patient communication regarding the limitations of AI-generated content in orthodontic practice.

متن کامل اصلی

نسخه دارای مجوز در منبع علمی در دسترس است.

لینک مستقیم از metadata منبع گرفته شده و در تب جدید باز می‌شود.

باز کردن متن کامل

کلیدواژه‌ها

Aesthetic judgmentArtificial intelligenceDigital trustImage perceptionOrthodonticsSynthetic media
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

An innovative device for scooting impacted third molars away from the inferior alveolar nerve.

OBJECTIVE: Impacted mandibular third molars pose significant clinical challenges, often leading to complications such as pericoronitis, adjacent tooth caries, and inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury during extraction. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the Kyola Distraction System, an innovative approach designed to gradually move impacted third molars away from the IAN, reducing surgical risks. METHODS: A retrospective analysi…

PubMed2026

Comparison between flowable and flowable bulk-fill composites in the manufacture of attachments for orthodontic aligners: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Orthodontic aligner attachments are crucial for enhancing dental movements that aligners alone cannot achieve. With recent advancements in design and materials, treatment precision and efficacy are improving. This study aimed to compare conventional and bulk-fill flowable composites in fabricating orthodontic attachments to determine their loss rate and clinical outcomes. METHODS: This split-mouth randomized clinical tria…

PubMed2026

Maxillary anterior retraction with clear aligner: a retrospective comparative cohort study of efficiency between periodontally healthy and stable periodontitis patients.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective comparative cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of maxillary anterior tooth retraction using clear aligners in patients with stable periodontitis compared to periodontally healthy individuals, addressing clinical concerns regarding the efficacy of aligner therapy in this population. METHODS: This retrospective study included 33 patients with stable periodontitis (SP) and 33 periodontally healthy …

PubMed2026

Photobiomodulation for primary wound healing and patient-reported outcomes after esthetic crown lengthening surgery: A pilot randomized clinical trial.

To evaluate the efficacy of photobiomodulation (PBM) on primary wound healing and patient-centered outcomes following esthetic clinical crown lengthening with osteotomy over a three-month follow-up period. Twenty-seven systemically healthy patients presenting < 10% bleeding on probing and altered passive eruption were enrolled in a split-mouth, triple-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial. Each patient underwent esthetic crown le…