PubMed دسترسی آزاد

Psychiatric nurses versus psychiatrists and pharmacists 'knowledge on polypharmacy practices in psychiatry: An interprofessional mixed-methods exploration.

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy is often crucial for managing complex and treatment-resistant psychiatric disorders, yet it carries risks such as adverse drug interactions, medication non-compliance, and suboptimal health outcomes. Interprofessional perspectives on polypharmacy significantly influence clinical decision-making and prescribing practices. AIM: This research evaluates healthcare providers' knowledge and attitudes regarding psychiatric polypharmacy, comparing the views of psychiatric nurses, psychiatrists, and pharmacists. It also explores how these factors impact prescribing behaviors and interprofessional collaboration. METHODS: A convergent mixed-methods approach was employed at the Erada Complex for Mental Health and Addiction in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The study involved 221 healthcare providers, including psychiatrists (n = 32), psychiatric nurses (n = 158), and pharmacists (n = 31). Quantitative data were collected using validated scales to assess knowledge and attitudes, while qualitative insights were gathered through open-ended responses and group discussions. RESULTS: Knowledge levels varied among the professionals, with psychiatrists possessing the most comprehensive understanding (84.2 ± 11.0), followed by pharmacists (81.5 ± 10.0) and psychiatric nurses (79.5 ± 9.8). Attitudes toward polypharmacy also differed, with psychiatrists showing the most favorable views (3.79 ± 0.49), whereas nurses and pharmacists were more cautious due to concerns about adverse effects and medication burden. A significant positive correlation (r = 0.653, p < 0.05) was observed between knowledge and attitude scores. Sociodemographic factors, such as professional experience and confidence in medication management, influenced both knowledge and attitudes regarding medication management. Qualitative findings highlighted interprofessional tensions, with psychiatric nurses advocating for more conservative approaches, psychiatrists emphasizing clinical necessity, and pharmacists focusing on optimizing medication safety. CONCLUSION: Healthcare providers demonstrated varying levels of awareness and attitudes toward psychiatric polypharmacy, shaped by their professional roles and responsibilities. While psychiatrists were more accepting of polypharmacy, psychiatric nurses expressed concerns about patient burden, and pharmacists prioritized safety considerations. Enhancing interprofessional collaboration and ongoing education on polypharmacy practices are essential for improving patient outcomes.

متن کامل اصلی

نسخه دارای مجوز در منبع علمی در دسترس است.

لینک مستقیم از metadata منبع گرفته شده و در تب جدید باز می‌شود.

باز کردن متن کامل
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

[THE EPISTEMOLOGY OF PSYCHIATRY: DISPOSITIF OF KNOWLEDGE AND PROFESSIONAL WORK].

The article offers systematic consideration of epistemology of psychiatry as section of medicine which examination permits to analyze dispositif of science successfully implementing conceptual theoretical constructs in everyday practice. The various versions and trends in this area are considered, from traditional history of medicine with its positive or negative models of development of psychiatry to historical epistemology and histor…

PubMed2026

Association Between Participant Satisfaction and Self-Reported Clinical Practice Behaviors in a Nationwide Guideline Education Program.

BACKGROUND: Educational interventions are widely used to promote guideline-concordant psychiatric practice. However, it remains unclear whether participants' subjective satisfaction translates into actual changes in clinical behavior (CB). This study examined the association between subjective assessment (SA) scores of the EGUIDE training programs for schizophrenia and major depressive disorder (MDD) and CB. METHODS: In this multicente…

PubMed2026

An Evaluation of AI-Generated Clinical Notes in the OpenNotes Era: A Thematic Analysis of Clinician Discourse.

BACKGROUND: The integration of ambient artificial intelligence (AI) scribes into the OpenNotes environment presents a profound governance crisis in healthcare. While patient access to medical records was designed as a transparency reform, the introduction of machine-generated text introduces novel vulnerabilities regarding record integrity, liability, and patients' trust. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates how clinicians discursively n…

PubMed2026

On the prowl for disciplinary vassals: Neurologists, psychiatrists, and clinical psychologists discuss science, technology, and profession at the National Research Council's Conference on Relations of Psychiatry to Psychology (1921).

The 1910s were a complex and rapidly changing decade in mental hygiene, marked by institutional innovation, professional development, and the expanding reconceptualization of mental disease and maladjustment. This growth frequently generated friction between practical clinical sciences, particularly psychiatry and consulting clinical psychology. After years of mounting tension, the National Research Council convened a joint conference …