PubMed چکیده/رکورد

Do they work, and are they worth it? Proposing a framework of evidence synthesis for guiding the evidence-based use of add-ons in in vitro fertilisation.

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

Add-ons are non-essential interventions offered in addition to standard infertility treatments, mainly in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and associated procedures, aimed at improving chances of pregnancy and live birth. While existing guidelines provide recommendations on the use of add-ons, they often overlook the trustworthiness of the underlying randomised controlled trials (RCTs), which may lead to misleading conclusions. Furthermore, some add-ons that may offer genuine benefits have been dismissed due to misinterpretation of trial results, or they are reserved for repeated implantation failure based on strategic rather than evidence-based arguments. Here, we propose a framework for an evidence synthesis process to guide the rational use of add-ons. The evaluation should begin with establishing effectiveness through systematic reviews of trustworthy RCTs, ignoring RCTs that do not meet trustworthiness criteria. When assessing effectiveness, the evaluation should consider evidence relating to the biological mechanisms targeted by the add-on, in addition to clinical outcomes such as live birth. For diagnostic add-ons, evaluations should focus on the group of patients whose test result leads to a change in clinical management, rather than analysing all test-exposed patients. Once effectiveness is confirmed, evaluating cost-effectiveness becomes crucial. Its cost per additional live birth should be compared to a benchmark (e.g., $27,000 or £20,000 for a live birth via standard IVF). Finally, once proven cost-effective, add-ons should be offered early, rather than delayed until after repeated treatment failures. It might be that effectiveness and cost-effectiveness increase with progression along the continuum of diagnosis or IVF failure such as recurrent implantation failure. In that case, add-ons may be offered as soon as they are considered cost-effective.

متن کامل اصلی

متن در JumpToDate ذخیره نشده است.

برای بررسی دسترسی کتابخانه‌ای یا خرید، رکورد اصلی را باز کنید.

رفتن به منبع اصلی

کلیدواژه‌ها

IVFadd-onscost-effectivenesseffectivenessevidence synthesis framework
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

[THE TRADITIONAL AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE IN THE PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEM OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION: ANALYSIS OF EVIDENCE BASE AND LEGAL ASPECTS OF INTEGRATION].

The article considers placement of methods of traditional and complementary medicine in the public health system of the Russian Federation, focusing on prevention and management of chronic non-communicable diseases. The analysis of the evidence base on key methods of traditional and complementary medicine (acupuncture, phytotherapy, homeopathy, manual therapy, osteopathy) was carried out, including differentiated estimate of level of e…

PubMed2026

Pseudo-publication bias in robotic surgery: structural mapping of narrative inertia.

The rapid worldwide adoption of robotic surgery often outpaces high-level comparative evidence. While evidence-based medicine relies on a hierarchical pyramid where causal inference resides at the apex, most of the scientific output is concentrated at the non-comparative base. It remains unknown whether the directional conclusions of these literature layers are symmetrically aligned. This study aimed to map the structural distribution …

PubMed2026

Use of Digital Clinical Decision Support System Increases Adherence to Provision of Evidence-Based Interventions for Elevated Intracranial Pressure During Simulated Care of Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical decision support (CDS) tools have been demonstrated to improve patient care and outcomes yet remain under-utilized in many clinical domains, including en route care. STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated whether a decision-tree CDS tool integrated within the government-created Battlefield Assisted Trauma Distributed Observation Kit (BATDOK; AFRL) clinical care software improves adherence to Joint Trauma System (J…

PubMed2026

Semi-automated rubrics for evidence-based medicine assessment: a case report on grading time reduction.

BACKGROUND: Librarians providing feedback on Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) assignments face time constraints. This case report describes implementing a semi-automated rubric - defined here as a tool that automatically calculates scores from grader-selected ratings while narrative feedback is still written by the instructor - to reduce grading time for an EBM capstone assignment for first-year medical students. CASE PRESENTATION: Two co…