PubMed چکیده/رکورد

Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation Using Dental Implant Robot and Osseodensification Drills: A Preliminary Case Series.

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the application of an autonomous dental implant robot combined with osseodensification drills for transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation (ADIR-OD-TSFE) and simultaneous implant placement. The following parameters, such as maxillary sinus elevation volume (MSV), maxillary sinus elevation area (MSA), membrane elevation height (MEH), implant protrusion length (IPL), implant placement accuracy, intraoperative Schneiderian membrane perforation rate, and operative time, were evaluated. In addition, the force feedback characteristics associated with different maxillary sinus floor morphologies were preliminarily investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study enrolled patients treated at the Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University between January and November 2024, with a residual bone height (RBH) of 4.00-8.00 mm, who underwent simultaneous implant placement using ADIR-OD-TSFE. Postoperative CBCT scans were imported into the design software to evaluate implant placement accuracy. The software's AI segmentation function was used to calculate the sinus floor augmentation outcome immediately after surgery (P1) and at 6 months postoperatively (P2). Force feedback characteristics were analyzed for two sinus floor morphologies (flat and sloped). The total operative time for osteotomy, sinus floor elevation, and implant placement performed with robotic assistance was recorded; the surgeon's learning curve was plotted, and the intraoperative complications were documented. RESULTS: A total of 18 implants were placed, with 9 in flat sinus floors and 9 in sloped sinus floors. The mean preoperative RBH was 5.92 ± 1.01 mm. Schneiderian membrane perforation occurred in 1 case (5.6%). The mean surgery time was 25.5 ± 9.8 min, and the surgeon's learning curve plateaued as case numbers increased. The coronal global deviation (CG), apical global deviation (AG), and angular deviation (AD) were 0.69 ± 0.36, 0.76 ± 0.41, and 1.64° ± 0.91°, respectively. The maxillary sinus floor elevation volume was 351.54 ± 151.74 mm3 immediately after surgery (P1) and 253.68 ± 160.60 mm3 at 6 months postoperatively (P2). Force feedback analysis showed that the breakthrough force was higher in flat sinus floors (Ff0) than in sloped sinus floors (Fs0), with a mean difference of 6.86 N, a 95% CI of 0.82 to 12.90 N, and a large effect size (Hedges' g = 1.08). CONCLUSION: The ADIR-OD-TSFE technique is effective for sinus floor elevation and implant placement, with the learning curve improving as the surgeon's experience increases. It demonstrates high implant placement accuracy and maintains relatively stable bone augmentation outcomes at 6 months postoperatively. Flat sinus floors require significantly higher breakthrough forces compared to sloped sinus floors. Overall, the ADIR-OD-TSFE system proves to be a safe and clinically reliable approach.

متن کامل اصلی

متن در JumpToDate ذخیره نشده است.

برای بررسی دسترسی کتابخانه‌ای یا خرید، رکورد اصلی را باز کنید.

رفتن به منبع اصلی

کلیدواژه‌ها

accuracyautonomous dental implant robotforce feedbackosseodensificationtranscrestal sinus floor elevation
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

Failure of Wide-Diameter Dental Implants (Predominantly 5.0 mm) Show Distinct Risk Profiles-A Large Cohort Study.

AIM: To evaluate survival rates and identify temporally distinct risk factors for early and late failure of wide-diameter dental implants (≥ 5.0 mm) in a large real-world cohort using landmark analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 12 041 wide-diameter implants (≥ 5.0 mm), predominantly 5.0 mm, placed in 9247 patients at a single center between January 2014 and December 2023. Implant survival was defi…

PubMed2026

Influence of Air Polishing and Ultrasonics on Veneer Margins in Vitro: An Optical Coherence Tomography Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE: In vitro evaluation of substance loss at the restoration margin of veneers was conducted as a function of prophylaxis procedures, air polishing, or ultrasonic instrumentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight extracted premolars were restored with CAD/CAM materials after veneer preparation (t0): lithium disilicate, zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramics, and resin-based composite. Five cycles of prophylaxis treatmen…

PubMed2026

Influence of Implant Type on Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes: A Cross-Sectional Private Practice-Based Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare tissue-level (TL) and bone-level X (BLX) implants regarding peri-implant bone level alterations, survival, and complication rates over a 3-years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, non-interventional clinical study, patients that had received either TL or BLX implants (both: Straumann AG), with at least one clinical follow-up (minimum 6 months), were included. Bone-level alterations and bone peaks were…

PubMed2026

Influence of Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithms on the Detection of Inferior Alveolar Canal Perforations by Zirconia Implants in CBCT Images.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm in detecting contact between zirconia implants and inferior alveolar canal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve zirconia implants were placed in dry human mandibles using surgical guides, in two conditions: 1 mm above and within the canal. cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was acquired with the MAR algorithm turned off and on. Three observ…