PubMed چکیده/رکورد

Plastic surgeon or surgical oncologist: Impact of surgical training background on outcomes in microsurgical head and neck reconstruction.

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

BACKGROUND: Microvascular free flap reconstruction is central to contemporary head and neck cancer surgery. Although plastic surgeons have traditionally performed these reconstructions, evolving training pathways have enabled other surgical subspecialties to acquire advanced microsurgical expertise. Comparative data between plastic surgeons and surgical oncologists trained in microsurgical reconstruction remain limited. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 300 patients who underwent head and neck reconstruction at the Cancer Institute of Iran between 2013 and 2022. Patients were stratified by operating surgeon specialty (surgical oncologist vs. plastic surgeon). Primary outcomes included operative duration, postoperative hemorrhage, flap failure, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and mortality. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used to assess performance trends and learning curves over time. RESULTS: Of 300 reconstructions, 192 (64.0%) were performed by surgical oncologists and 108 (36.0%) by plastic surgeons. Baseline demographics and comorbidities were comparable between groups. There were no significant differences in flap failure (9.4% vs. 9.3%), postoperative hemorrhage (7.3% vs. 3.7%), ICU stay, or mortality (4.2% vs. 3.7%). Operative duration was longer in the surgical oncology group on unadjusted analysis; however, surgeon specialty was not an independent predictor after multivariable adjustment. CUSUM analysis demonstrated stable outcomes over time for both groups, with no evidence of an active learning curve. CONCLUSION: In a high-volume center with structured microsurgical training, surgical oncologists achieve outcomes comparable to plastic surgeons in head and neck reconstruction. These findings support expansion of microsurgical reconstruction beyond traditional specialty boundaries when appropriate training and institutional support are present.

متن کامل اصلی

متن در JumpToDate ذخیره نشده است.

برای بررسی دسترسی کتابخانه‌ای یا خرید، رکورد اصلی را باز کنید.

رفتن به منبع اصلی

کلیدواژه‌ها

Head and neck neoplasmsLearning curveMicrosurgeryPlastic surgerySurgical flapsSurgical oncology
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

Geographic Distribution of Plastic Surgeons in Tennessee: A County-Level Analysis of Workforce Availability.

OBJECTIVE: Access to surgical specialists often is influenced by the geographic distribution of the workforce. Limited data describing the plastic surgery workforce in Tennessee exist. This study aimed to describe the county- and region-level distribution of the plastic surgery workforce in Tennessee. METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted. State- and county-level population estimates were obtained from US Census da…

PubMed2026

Demographic characteristics and self-reported motivations of women undergoing genital aesthetic surgery: A descriptive cohort of 927 patients in Turkey (2017-2024).

ObjectiveGenital aesthetic surgery, within the broader domain of female genital cosmetic surgery, has become increasingly visible in clinical practice. However, descriptive data on patient characteristics and self-reported motivations remain limited. This study describes the demographic profile, psychosocial context, motivations, and procedural patterns among women undergoing genital aesthetic surgery in Turkey.MethodsThis descriptive …

PubMed2026

Three-Dimensional Bioprinting in Reconstructive Plastic Surgery: A Comprehensive Review.

Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is an evolving biofabrication approach in regenerative medicine with the potential to overcome many limitations of conventional reconstructive techniques, including donor-site morbidity, limited tissue availability, and suboptimal restoration of form and function. Recent advances in biofabrication have accelerated the development of patient-specific living constructs for reconstructive applications. T…

PubMed2026

Biohacking Recovery: The Cutting Edge in Facial Plastic Surgery.

The traditional "rest and wait" approach to surgical recovery is being replaced by proactive biohacking strategies designed to optimize patient biology. This paper explores "pre-covery" and postoperative protocols that modulate systemic stress responses and facilitate repair. By integrating modalities such as hyperbaric oxygen therapy, pulsed electromagnetic field therapy, and photobiomodulation, surgeons can actively accelerate tissue…