PubMed چکیده/رکورد

Assessing the perceived need for maxillary expansion: a survey of general dentists, pediatric dentists, and orthodontists.

استودیوی صوتی مقاله

پخش حرفه‌ای فارسی و انگلیسی

در حال بررسی نسخه‌های صوتی ذخیره‌شده…

صوت تولیدشده با هوش مصنوعی است. برای کاربرد علمی یا درمانی، متن و منبع اصلی را بررسی کنید.
خواندن هوشمند فارسی و انگلیسی در حال آماده‌سازی صداهای مرورگر…
تنظیم صدای طبیعی و سرعت

صداهایی که در نامشان «Natural»، «Neural» یا «Online» دیده می‌شود معمولاً طبیعی‌ترند. انتخاب صدا به صداهای نصب‌شده در ویندوز و مرورگر شما بستگی دارد.

چکیده اصلی

This study evaluated and compared the perceptions of general dentists, pediatric dentists, and orthodontists regarding the need for transverse maxillary expansion for Class I malocclusions with posterior crossbite. An electronic survey consisting of digitally manipulated intraoral images depicting 8 clinical scenarios was distributed to 10,000 general dentists, 8734 pediatric dentists, and 2400 orthodontists. A total of 566 practitioners responded (2.7% response rate): 85 general dentists, 339 pediatric dentists, and 142 orthodontists. For each case, participants assessed the need for expansion, type of expansion, and referral preferences. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression, which were adjusted for specialty, years of experience, and geographic region. Significant differences in perception were observed in 6 of the 8 cases (P < 0.05), primarily influenced by specialty training. Orthodontists demonstrated significantly higher odds of recommending expansion than general dentists, particularly in more complex presentations. Pediatric dentists more frequently opted for referral rather than treatment. Neither years of practice nor geographic region significantly influenced diagnostic decisions. Survey reliability demonstrated moderate to substantial agreement across repeated cases (κ = 0.424 to 0.677), and power analysis indicated sufficient sample size and effect sizes for most scenarios. These findings suggest that specialty training strongly influences the perceived need for transverse maxillary expansion, highlighting a potential need for enhanced orthodontic diagnostic education in dental and pediatric residency programs to promote consistency in the diagnosis and management of transverse discrepancies across dental specialties.

متن کامل اصلی

متن در JumpToDate ذخیره نشده است.

برای بررسی دسترسی کتابخانه‌ای یا خرید، رکورد اصلی را باز کنید.

رفتن به منبع اصلی

کلیدواژه‌ها

interdisciplinary perceptionsmaxillary expansionorthodonticstransverse deficiency
در همین زیرشاخه

مقاله‌های مرتبط

PubMed2026

Burnout among pediatric dentists: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Burnout, encompassing high emotional exhaustion (EE), high depersonalisation (DP), and low personal accomplishment (PA) as measured by the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), remains poorly characterised among paediatric dentists. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate prevalence of MBI-based burnout dimensions and associated factors, following a protocol prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251238894) and rep…

PubMed2026

Knowledge and awareness of sensory processing disorder and sensory-adapted dental care among pediatric dentists: A cross-sectional survey.

AIM: The study aimed to assess the knowledge and awareness of sensory processing disorder (SPD) and sensory-adapted dental care among pediatric dentists and to identify gaps in the recognition, assessment, and management of children with SPD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey was conducted among 145 practicing pediatric dentists. A self-administered 14-item questionnaire was developed following a revie…

PubMed2026

Large language models for early childhood caries risk triage: A validation study using standardized pediatric dental vignettes.

PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy and public health utility of Gemini 2.5 Flash and GPT-4 for early childhood caries (ECC) risk triage in classifying presentations as high risk (warranting immediate referral) or low risk (amenable to preventive counseling). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A standardized dataset of 50 clinical vignettes (25 high risk and 25 low risk) was evaluated against both large language models via official applica…

PubMed2026

Effectiveness of Buffered Lidocaine With Sodium Bicarbonate Versus Conventional Lidocaine as Local Anesthetic Solutions for Pain Management in Pediatric Dentistry: A Randomized, Split-Mouth, Crossover, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Managing injection pain is critical for pediatric patient cooperation. The clinical benefit of using 7.5% sodium bicarbonate-buffered lidocaine, compared to its unbuffered counterpart, has not been extensively studied in children using a controlled split-mouth design. Hence, this clinical trial aimed to compare the pain control efficacy of buffered versus conventional lidocaine in pediatric dentistry, assessing pain during …